0
What else can I help you with?
Compare morphological and biochemical evidence supporting evolution?
The morphological evidence which is shown in fossils to modern animals supports evolution because some dinosaurs, for instance, had feathers and we can obviously see that trait today in birds. The biochemical evidence, which comes in the form of DNA comparison and amino acid similarities, shows that we related closely to monkeys and pigs, which suggests that we have close ancestors to these animals.
What evidence did scientist use to support evolution theory?
First of all, evolution is a FACT not a theory. You must be referring to Charles Darwin's theory of evolution by means of natural selection. There is no denying the fact that evolution happens, scientists just didn't know exactly how it worked until Darwin suggested one plausible scientific explanation which he called natural selection. Natural selection is simply the change in allele frequencies of an organism which results that organism becoming either better or worse suited to survive in its environment. Being better suited to survive means that the organism is more likely to pass on the beneficial genetic trait to it's offspring. Rather than asking for evidence which helps prove evolution, try looking for verifiable scientific evidence which disproves it. After all, science is not about making claims and looking for evidence to prove them, but rather generating hypothesis and looking for ways to disprove them.
Which best describe evolution?
the evolution comes to the origin of species.
If your skin comes into direct contact an unknown material the first thing should do is?
Notify a lab supervisor
What is a plausible?
This is when someone comes up with an idea, a theory but doesn't have enough evidence for it or can't explain why they think it happens.
Why is the geolgical column not really evidence for evolution?
The geological column is not direct evidence for evolution because it primarily represents a chronological sequence of rock layers and fossils, not a documentation of evolutionary processes. Evolutionary evidence comes from the patterns of similarities and differences among living organisms, the fossil record, comparative anatomy, embryology, and molecular biology. The geological column helps provide a context for understanding the timing of evolutionary events but does not in itself prove the theory of evolution.
What is direct approach?
When you use the direct approach, the main idea (such as a recommendation, conclusion, or request) comes in the "top" of the document, followed by the evidence.
What is the only evidence you have to support evolution?
The primary evidence supporting evolution comes from a combination of fossil records, comparative anatomy, embryology, molecular biology, and observed genetic changes over time. These pieces of evidence collectively provide a strong foundation for the theory of evolution.
How do paleontologists help with evidence of evolution?
Palaeontologists uncover, examine, categorize and publish about fossils. An important part of what we know of the natural history of life on Earth comes from fossil evidence.
What is direct approach of business letter writing?
Direct approach of business letter writing is when the main point or purpose of the letter comes first followed by the evidence.
Where does the most evidence for evolution comes from?
The most compelling evidence, as well as the greatest amount of observational data to support the evolutionary model and aid in its refinement, comes from genetics and comparative genomics. The genomic record (the complete library of all sequenced genomes and the genes they contain) is by far the most complete record of evolution that we have at our disposal. Additionally, the fossil record can be used to test and verify hypotheses regarding timing of emergence, behaviours and morphology of ancestral forms.
Evidence that supports the theory of evolution of the studies of what?
Evidence supporting the theory of evolution comes from various fields, including genetics (DNA similarities between species), paleontology (fossil record showing transitional species), embryology (similarities in early stages of development), and biogeography (distribution of species across different regions). These studies collectively provide strong evidence for the process of evolution by natural selection.
Is there more information for or against evolution?
On almost a monthly basis, more data comes to light in the form of new fossils and other finds, that further support the Theory of Evolution.Charles Darwin (1809-1892) was not the first to study evolution, but he developed the Theory of Evolution by Natural Selection after observing the evidence for evolution during his voyage in HMS Beagle, and followed up by decades of research. This theory says that species evolved over time in response to changes in the natural environment, and was seen by scientists as the best explanation for the facts.There is ample evidence of the transition from one species to another, demonstrating that evolution really did occur. Conversely, there is no real evidence that evolution has not occurred. Those who debate the facts of evolution are left with unsupported hypotheses, often claiming that the world is too young for evolution to have occurred, or that the Laws of Thermodynamics disprove the theory. A third viewpoint is offered by a minority of creationists, such as Willian Dembski. As a qualified scientist, he accepts the immense age of the earth and the reality of evolution, but believes that there may be natural systems that cannot be explained entirely in terms of natural causes and that exhibit features characteristic of intelligent design.For more information, please visit: http://christianity.answers.com/theology/the-story-of-creation
Where is the majority of evidence to support evolution?
The majority of evidence supporting evolution comes from multiple scientific disciplines, including paleontology, genetics, biochemistry, and comparative anatomy. Fossil records, DNA sequencing, and studies of transitional forms provide compelling evidence for the descent of species from common ancestors and the mechanisms of natural selection driving evolutionary change over time.
Compare morphological and biochemical evidence supporting evolution?
The morphological evidence which is shown in fossils to modern animals supports evolution because some dinosaurs, for instance, had feathers and we can obviously see that trait today in birds. The biochemical evidence, which comes in the form of DNA comparison and amino acid similarities, shows that we related closely to monkeys and pigs, which suggests that we have close ancestors to these animals.
Indirect evidence of earth's interior comes from studying rock samples?
By analyzing rock samples from the surface and drilling cores, scientists can gain insight into the composition, structure, and properties of Earth's interior. Through techniques such as mineral analysis, isotopic dating, and seismic studies, researchers can infer the processes that have shaped the planet and its layers over billions of years. This indirect evidence helps build our understanding of Earth's history, evolution, and dynamics.
What evidence do we have of evolution?
Evidence of common descent of living organisms has been discovered by scientists researching in a variety of disciplines over many decades, demonstrating that all life on Earth comes from a single ancestor.
