The purposes of testing a hypothesis is to test it. Pass or fail, the experiment is a "success" if it does that - tests the hyposthesis. If the results don't support the hypothesis, then that is valuable data that helps you either abandon or refine the hypothesis.
No, the experiment was not a waste of time. It has now let you know that one hypothesis was wrong. You are now free to focus the more on another hypothesis.
end the experiment and throw away the datarepeat the experiment until the hypothesis is supportedchange the hypothesisargue that the results were
draw conclusions
draw conclusions
You want to have a hypothesis to test. A hypothesis is kind of like a reasoned guess what you expect to happen. The results of your experiment will either support your hypothesis or it wont.
To idicate what specific results will support a hypothesis
end the experiment and throw away the datarepeat the experiment until the hypothesis is supportedchange the hypothesisargue that the results were
draw conclusions
draw conclusions
draw conclusions
draw conclusions
You want to have a hypothesis to test. A hypothesis is kind of like a reasoned guess what you expect to happen. The results of your experiment will either support your hypothesis or it wont.
Science is not a way to do experiments that support hypotheses. Science is a way to figure out reality. So if a well-designed experiment gets results different from what is expected....Hooray!!! You might have discovered a whole new truth!
sonic unleashed perfect dark gaia
To idicate what specific results will support a hypothesis
Throw away that hypothesis because it is wrong. Form a new, different hypothesis and design and undertake experiments to test that one.
An experiment might not support a hypothesis even if the hypothesis is correct because if the conclusion
They should try again. Then check very carefully and see if they did the experiment correctly. They may have to change their hypothesis.