We know better.
It is not a bad thing when your hypothesis is not supported, because this shows science working as it should. Something has been learned, and a possible explanation for an effect can be taken off the table, for the most part. The statement is qualified because researchers can now consider whether or not the right controls were put into place, or whether or not there is a more basic flaw in the design of the experiment. If everything is in order, the search for an other explanation gets underway.
Wegener's theory didn't explain how the continents could plow through the solid rock of the sea floor, and he was unable to give a convincing explanation of what force could move entire continents.
After making careful observations,scientists construct a hypotesis and a scientific theory is a statement that supported by many scientific observations. so a theory is firm, because a scientific theory is an explanation of a broad range of related phenomena based on repeated testing of a hypothesis
Lamarck proposed a scientific explanation for evolution because organisms evovled through the inherititance of acquired charactaristics.
A hypothesis cannot be call a theory because,it has not supported a prediction even in the face of several experiment.
Alfred Weqener's theory/ hypothesis was considered controversial because Alfred did not have an explanation for why the continents, North America, South America, Africa, Asia, Antarctica, Australia, and Europe have separated or moved.
They are continents. Unless, because they are joined, you consider them part of a single continent, i.e. America.
Theres 1 in south America, because south America IS a continent
South America is one continent, and it does not have continents in it or on it because South America in itself is one big continent. There are countries in the continent of South America, but not continents.
there were actually 4 continents if the alluetians count as north America then it was fought on 4 continents, because the Japanese invaded te alluetians the 4 continents were Asia, Africa, Europe,and north America
Because they are
Because some other continents theres slavery and in america, it's free
The continents of North America and South America are considered as one (called the Americas) and Antarctica is not included because there are no indigenous people from there.
because the other continents weren't involved
He could not provide a wholly acceptable explanation for the movement of the continents.
Canada actually has no continents. You need to phrase your questions properly. "How continents does Canada have?" actually makes no sense at all. You should have said "What continent does Canada belong to?" Because we don't own any continents. To answer your question: North America.
This is actually a difficult question to answer because it ranges from 4-7 continents. Here are the possible outcomes: 7 continents: -North America -South America -Europe -Africa -Asia -Australia -Antarctica (This is the most commonly used) [6 continents are rarely used because you would have to combine either Europe/Asia, Europe/Africa, Africa/Asia or North/South America, and if you only combine one why not the other?] 5 continents: -America (North/South America) -Eurasia (Europe/Asia) -Africa -Australia -Antarctica 4 continents: -America (North/South America) -Eurafrasia (Europe/Africa/Asia) -Australia -Antarctica