0
What else can I help you with?
Are steps in the scientific method?
describe steps of scientific method
What is difference from scientific law and scientific theory?
A scientific law is a proven, verifiable fact or formula that doesn't change. that are considered universal and invariable facts of the physical worldFor example Newton's law of relativity and Newton's law of gravity.Laws of science may, however, be disproved if new facts or evidence contradicts them.iA hypothesis is a proposed explanation for an observable phenomenonFor a hypothesis to be put forward as a scientific hypothesis, the scientific method requires that one can test it. Scientists generally base scientific hypotheses on previous obserations that cannot satisfactorily be explained with the available scientific theories.
How does scientific process generally begin?
i dont know you tell me scientific process begins with Observation and investigation .
What are the main qualities of a good hypothesis?
iA hypothesis is a proposed explanation for an observable phenomenon. For a hypothesis to be put forward as a scientific hypothesis, the scientific method requires that one can test it. Scientists generally base scientific hypotheses on previous obserations that cannot satisfactorily be explained with the available scientific theories.These are the essential traits of a good hypothesis:TestibilitySimplicityScope - the apparent application of the hypothesis to multiple cases of phenomenaFruitfulness - the prospect that a hypothesis may explain further phenomena in the futureConservatism - the degree of "fit" with existing recognized knowledge-systemsA hypothesis cannot contradict scientific laws.
What is pseudosciences?
Pseudoscience is something that sounds scientific, but that can't be proven or isn't accepted by actual scientists, such as the belief that 2012 would be the end of the world because of the Mayan calendar or the hollow earth theory.
Do scientist use Celsius or Fahrenheit to measure temperature?
Scientists generally use Celsius (or Kelvin) to measure temperature, as it is the standard unit in the scientific community. Fahrenheit is rarely used in scientific studies or publications.
Are steps in the scientific method?
describe steps of scientific method
What is a scientific opinion article?
A scientific opinion is normally held by a scientific body such as a 'learned society' or 'national organisation' or perhaps a science-based government body. It is the formal consensus position of the scientists of that organisation. More abstractly, scientific opinion (analagous to public opinion) is the consensus between the various published scientific opinions, and need not be unique (eg: their could be two dissenting groups of opinions). Generally, inidividual scientists opinions do not contribute to 'scientific opinion' in the same way scientific organisational opinions do (because they are somewhat irrelevant, in the same way that fringe opinions of individual public do not necessarily impact on 'public opinion' generally) As for 'scientific opinion article' I would guess it is an article which presents or explores scientific opinion as above. Normally scientific opinion is formulated from scientific bodies issuing 'position statements' and the like, not articles. I really appreciate this article, I feel this was of great help Its just amazing, the scientific knowledge is explained clearly here
Which scientists do not believe in ghosts?
Many scientists do not believe in ghosts because there is no scientific evidence to support their existence. Ghosts are generally seen as a phenomenon that falls more into the realm of culture, folklore, and belief systems rather than scientific inquiry. Scientists prioritize evidence-based explanations for the world around us, which typically do not include supernatural entities like ghosts.
Why do diet plans use scientific words?
Generally because scientific words are more precise.
How does the scientific generally begin?
i dont know you tell me scientific process begins with Observation and investigation .
What is difference from scientific law and scientific theory?
A scientific law is a proven, verifiable fact or formula that doesn't change. that are considered universal and invariable facts of the physical worldFor example Newton's law of relativity and Newton's law of gravity.Laws of science may, however, be disproved if new facts or evidence contradicts them.iA hypothesis is a proposed explanation for an observable phenomenonFor a hypothesis to be put forward as a scientific hypothesis, the scientific method requires that one can test it. Scientists generally base scientific hypotheses on previous obserations that cannot satisfactorily be explained with the available scientific theories.
How does scientific process generally begin?
i dont know you tell me scientific process begins with Observation and investigation .
Why does Answers com publish an etymology of the phrase carbon neutral which states that carbon IS a contributor to global warming when according to all research so far this is not proven to be fact?
Because there is no such thing as a 'scientific fact'. Even gravity is not a 'scientific fact'. Scientists do not work with 'facts' but will levels of confidence, of probability. When there is a high level of confidence among the entire scientific community on a particular issue, that is called a 'consensus'. When a scientists has a different opinion (ie, after conducting research and writing a scientific paper), such a differing opinion is generally called a 'hypothesis'. For example: the general scientific consensus is that the earth is round. However, there are still some hypothesis regarding the earth being flat. As long as scientists claiming the earth being flat are not able to convince their fellow scientists through validated research methods which can be repeated by others and peer-reviewed publications in scientific journals, the scientific consensus will not alter. Same is applicable to carbon. The general consensus is that it is a contributor to Global Warming while a minority of scientists have differing hypothesis. Some day their hypothesis might become the general consensus but for that to happen they first have to convince their fellow scientists of the validity of their scientific claims and their research.
Which case ruled that scientific evidence was admissible only if it was generally accepted by the scientific?
The case you are referring to is Frye v. United States (1923). This ruling established the Frye standard, which stated that scientific evidence is admissible in court only if it is generally accepted within the relevant scientific community.
Is Scientific American a reliable source for scientific information?
Yes, Scientific American is generally considered a reliable source for scientific information due to its rigorous editorial process and reputation for publishing accurate and credible research.
What is the scientific name for halite?
Halite is the scientific name of Sodium chloride (salt). Generally it is used one of the dietary component.
