that research and observations support the theory
that research and observations support the theory is the correct answer
law
Principle
hlijaK
describe steps of scientific method
A scientific law is a proven, verifiable fact or formula that doesn't change. that are considered universal and invariable facts of the physical worldFor example Newton's law of relativity and Newton's law of gravity.Laws of science may, however, be disproved if new facts or evidence contradicts them.iA hypothesis is a proposed explanation for an observable phenomenonFor a hypothesis to be put forward as a scientific hypothesis, the scientific method requires that one can test it. Scientists generally base scientific hypotheses on previous obserations that cannot satisfactorily be explained with the available scientific theories.
i dont know you tell me scientific process begins with Observation and investigation .
iA hypothesis is a proposed explanation for an observable phenomenon. For a hypothesis to be put forward as a scientific hypothesis, the scientific method requires that one can test it. Scientists generally base scientific hypotheses on previous obserations that cannot satisfactorily be explained with the available scientific theories.These are the essential traits of a good hypothesis:TestibilitySimplicityScope - the apparent application of the hypothesis to multiple cases of phenomenaFruitfulness - the prospect that a hypothesis may explain further phenomena in the futureConservatism - the degree of "fit" with existing recognized knowledge-systemsA hypothesis cannot contradict scientific laws.
Pseudoscience is something that sounds scientific, but that can't be proven or isn't accepted by actual scientists, such as the belief that 2012 would be the end of the world because of the Mayan calendar or the hollow earth theory.
describe steps of scientific method
A scientific opinion is normally held by a scientific body such as a 'learned society' or 'national organisation' or perhaps a science-based government body. It is the formal consensus position of the scientists of that organisation. More abstractly, scientific opinion (analagous to public opinion) is the consensus between the various published scientific opinions, and need not be unique (eg: their could be two dissenting groups of opinions). Generally, inidividual scientists opinions do not contribute to 'scientific opinion' in the same way scientific organisational opinions do (because they are somewhat irrelevant, in the same way that fringe opinions of individual public do not necessarily impact on 'public opinion' generally) As for 'scientific opinion article' I would guess it is an article which presents or explores scientific opinion as above. Normally scientific opinion is formulated from scientific bodies issuing 'position statements' and the like, not articles. I really appreciate this article, I feel this was of great help Its just amazing, the scientific knowledge is explained clearly here
Generally because scientific words are more precise.
i dont know you tell me scientific process begins with Observation and investigation .
This is generally called experimentation, and it's goal is to prove a hypothesis. It's a part of the scientific method.
A scientific law is a proven, verifiable fact or formula that doesn't change. that are considered universal and invariable facts of the physical worldFor example Newton's law of relativity and Newton's law of gravity.Laws of science may, however, be disproved if new facts or evidence contradicts them.iA hypothesis is a proposed explanation for an observable phenomenonFor a hypothesis to be put forward as a scientific hypothesis, the scientific method requires that one can test it. Scientists generally base scientific hypotheses on previous obserations that cannot satisfactorily be explained with the available scientific theories.
i dont know you tell me scientific process begins with Observation and investigation .
The case you are referring to is Frye v. United States (1923). This ruling established the Frye standard, which stated that scientific evidence is admissible in court only if it is generally accepted within the relevant scientific community.
Because there is no such thing as a 'scientific fact'. Even gravity is not a 'scientific fact'. Scientists do not work with 'facts' but will levels of confidence, of probability. When there is a high level of confidence among the entire scientific community on a particular issue, that is called a 'consensus'. When a scientists has a different opinion (ie, after conducting research and writing a scientific paper), such a differing opinion is generally called a 'hypothesis'. For example: the general scientific consensus is that the earth is round. However, there are still some hypothesis regarding the earth being flat. As long as scientists claiming the earth being flat are not able to convince their fellow scientists through validated research methods which can be repeated by others and peer-reviewed publications in scientific journals, the scientific consensus will not alter. Same is applicable to carbon. The general consensus is that it is a contributor to Global Warming while a minority of scientists have differing hypothesis. Some day their hypothesis might become the general consensus but for that to happen they first have to convince their fellow scientists of the validity of their scientific claims and their research.
Halite is the scientific name of Sodium chloride (salt). Generally it is used one of the dietary component.
Scientists, Mathematicians and Engineers generally use scientific notation. In particular, those scientists and engineers who have to measure distances, weights or volumes of a very large or very small size. Astronomers, for example, may measure the distance of stars that are billions of billions of light years away. Wouldn't you rather write 4.9 * 1015 instead of 4,900,000,000,000,000?
Chocolate generally is Theobroma .