answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

The case you are referring to is Frye v. United States (1923). This ruling established the Frye standard, which stated that scientific evidence is admissible in court only if it is generally accepted within the relevant scientific community.

User Avatar

AnswerBot

5d ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Which case ruled that scientific evidence was admissible only if it was generally accepted by the scientific?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about Information Science

Scientific and technological Discoveries are accepted if their evdicence can be?

Scientific and technological discoveries are accepted if their evidence can be empirically validated through rigorous experimentation, observation, and analysis. Consistent replication of results by multiple researchers and the ability to make predictions based on the discovery also contribute to its acceptance within the scientific community.


What is the difference between scientific and non-scientific statements?

Scientific statements are based on evidence, observation, and experimentation, following the scientific method to ensure accuracy and reliability. Non-scientific statements may lack empirical evidence, rely on personal beliefs or opinions, or be based on subjective experiences rather than objective data.


Why were Wegener's ideas not immediately accepted by the scientific commu?

Wegener's ideas were not immediately accepted because he lacked a mechanism to explain how continents could move. Additionally, his theory challenged long-standing geological beliefs and there was not enough evidence at the time to support his hypothesis of continental drift. It was not until the development of the theory of plate tectonics in the 1960s that Wegener's ideas gained widespread acceptance.


What is the scientific name of ghosts?

There is no scientific evidence to support the existence of ghosts, so there is no scientific name for them. Ghosts are often considered to be a paranormal or supernatural phenomenon that is not recognized by the scientific community.


What is the scientific name for the loch ness monster?

The scientific name for the Loch Ness monster is not real, as the creature is considered to be a myth or legend. There is no scientific evidence to support its existence.

Related questions

How is Frye Standard used in courts?

Scientific evidence is allowed into the courtroom if it is generally accepted by the relevant scientific community. It does not offer any guidance on reliability. the evidence is presented in the trial and the jury decides if it can be used.


Are palm prints and fingerprints inadmissible of admissible?

Admissible as evidence


Which of these best describes the basis on which new scientific ideas are accepted or rejected?

New scientific ideas are accepted or rejected based on compelling evidence.


How do you use admissible in a sentence?

Your mode of dress is not admissible in court. The evidence cries to be admissible, your honor!


What describes the basis on which new scientific ideas are accepted or rejected?

New scientific ideas are accepted or rejected based on compelling evidence.


Is not admissible evidence in court?

Hearsay


How can Scientific and technological discoveries be accepted by evidence?

repeated .... nova net :))


Why a new scientific hypothesis might be accepted or rejected?

Observational evidence


Can you give me a sentence for the word admissible?

The evidence was not admissible in court due to it having no relevance to the proceedings.


Are weekly AAA meetings admissible in court?

AA meetings can be admissible in court. If they are court ordered or relevant to an issue or evidence, then it usually is admissible.


How would you use admissible in a sentence?

In a court of law the only evidence that can be admissible must be gotten legally.


A photocopy of a document that is not legally admissible document will it become admissible if the involved party admits it as susch?

Not at all. If a document is not admissible in evidence, than the question of admissibality not arise...