Evolution is the change in allele frequency over time in a population of organisms. This is observed and observable. In plant this can be seen in one generation by the process of polyploidy. Where chromosome number can double, for example, in one mating and thus fulfill the definition of both evolution and speciation.
Intelligence is merely a property of some lifeforms. It has no direct relationship to evolution and can say nothing either way, although the apparent development of intelligence combined with otehr mechanisms (e.g. suitability, usefulness) may be considered evidence.
I do not ' believe ' in evolution, but I am convinced by the evidence.
Direct evidence are visible noticable changes. Indirect evidence is when you might not see the action happen but you do notice the results
"The evidence for evolution countervails over the arguments against it." THis means that evidence for evolution counteracts the arguments against it.
Fossils can be used as evidence for evolution because they can show the development of a species over a long period of time.
direct evidence is the observation as it occurs
There are thousands of instances of direct evidence of evolution. The most well-known example is that of Darwin's Finches. These finches were observed through fossil records to have changed over time to adapt to their environment.
Polyploidy in plants, for one instance the doubling of chromosomes at mating, is direct evidence not only for evolution but for speciation as well. I fact many to most modern angiosperm species are developed this way.
Biochemical evidence of evolution is considered indirect because it does not provide direct evidence of specific evolutionary events or transitions in the fossil record. Instead, it demonstrates similarities in molecular structures or sequences across different species, which support the idea of a common ancestor but do not directly show the process of evolution occurring.
direct evidence is the observation of evolution as it occurs. We have discovered novel genes conferring an advantage in an environment in which the ancestral population lacked those genes entirely. One example is flavobacterium that evolved nylonase enzymes. Antibiotic resistance is another example.
Intelligence is merely a property of some lifeforms. It has no direct relationship to evolution and can say nothing either way, although the apparent development of intelligence combined with otehr mechanisms (e.g. suitability, usefulness) may be considered evidence.
Indirect evidence in evolution refers to evidence that supports a particular evolutionary hypothesis through inference rather than direct observation. This can include fossil records, comparative anatomy, embryology, and molecular biology studies that provide clues about the relationships between different species and how they have evolved over time. This type of evidence helps scientists piece together the history and patterns of evolution.
Evolution
In evolution the study of vertebrate forelimbs is related to the anatomical evidence from homology.
Biochemical evidence of evolution is considered indirect because it does not provide direct observation of evolutionary changes happening over time. Instead, it relies on comparing similarities and differences in biochemistry, such as DNA sequences or protein structures, to infer evolutionary relationships among organisms.
All of the above examples are direct evidence for evolution. Genetic changes in plants, antibiotic resistance in bacteria, and pesticide resistance in insects all demonstrate how species can adapt and evolve to survive in changing environments. This supports the theory of evolution by natural selection.
In evolution the study of vertebrate forelimbs is related to the anatomical evidence from homology.