A greater volume of water would cause this.
The change of a liquid to a gas is a physical change because its chemical properties do not change. Molecules of the liquid are just moving farther apart, therefore turning into a gaseous state.
The density of air changes with change of temperature, therefore changing it's mass. In other words, the molecules that make up the composition of air move farther apart with a rise in temp and, of course, just the opposite with a decrease in temp. Since temperature changes the mass of air, gravitational pull from the earth will change proportionately.
1. This is ambiguous it could be said to be a chemical change because the intermolecular forces between strands of cellulose are broken. however simplistically it might be said to be merely physical. 2. Chemical change. 3. Physical change specifically a change in state of matter. 4. Chemical change. This is a combustion reaction. 5. Chemical change. Iron (Fe) reacts with oxygen (O) 6. Chemical change. This is a modification of the proteins in the milk usually by the enzyme trypsin. 7. again a bit ambiguous As humans are made up of chemicals and nutrients need to be digested and deposited for growth it is justifiable chemical however simplistically it is physical.
No, the function of the fulcrum remains the same The only change would be the ratio of force to load The closer the fulcrum is the the load, the less force required to lift it The farther away the fulcrum is from the load, the more force required to lift it
the difference between a physical change and a chemical change is that a physical change is usually reversible whilst a chemical change is not reversible.
it's a mixture !
yes, he was for it first and then like mccain stole the democrat theme of change he claimed all of a sudden he to was for offshore drilling.
get farther from a change
no because of the aluetion change(group of island) Alaska is farther west.
Deposition, the depositing of fine silt and animal carcasses on the floor of lakes and seas, has nothing to do with the slow erosion by water (freezing and flowing) and wind of boulders into pebbles.
No.
Producing soot by burning something is a chemical change, but when it is deposited on metal (or anything else), that is a not a chemical change.See the Related Questions to the left for more information.
It is a type of fish pebbles and it make them change colors i had a white female i feed her the pebbles and she turned purple and pink. and i had a dark blu male now he is red dark blue and sky blue he is preety
They allowed businesses access to markets farther away
because of its heat, depending on if we're closer to it or farther
The noise of the pebbles' being pulled backwards and forwards by the waves.
well as my theory is the particles get farther apart