When new data challenges existing scientific explanations, it prompts a re-evaluation of current theories and models. Scientists investigate the discrepancies through experiments, observations, or analyses, which may lead to refinements in existing theories or the development of new ones. This iterative process is fundamental to scientific progress, as it ensures that our understanding of the natural world evolves with accumulating evidence. Ultimately, such challenges foster critical inquiry and innovation within the scientific community.
The explanation of how or why something happens based on scientific study is referred to as a scientific theory or hypothesis. These explanations are derived from systematic observations, experiments, and analysis of data. They aim to provide a coherent understanding of natural phenomena by identifying underlying mechanisms and relationships. Scientific theories are continually tested and refined through further research and experimentation.
A scientific law and a scientific theory are both essential components of the scientific method, but they serve different purposes. A scientific law describes a consistent and observable phenomenon, often expressed mathematically, while a scientific theory explains the underlying mechanisms and reasons behind those phenomena. Both are based on extensive empirical evidence and can be tested and refined over time, but laws summarize what happens, whereas theories provide explanations for why it happens.
Scientific laws are concise statements that describe consistent and universal relationships observed in nature, often expressed mathematically. They are based on repeated experimental observations and are universally applicable under specified conditions. Unlike theories, which provide explanations for phenomena, laws describe what happens without delving into the underlying reasons. Scientific laws are always subject to testing and can be refined or revised as new evidence emerges.
Scientific theories are well-substantiated explanations of natural phenomena based on a body of evidence and rigorous testing. They are not mere guesses but are developed through the scientific method and can be refined or revised as new evidence emerges. Importantly, theories can explain a wide range of observations and can make predictions that can be tested experimentally. Unlike laws, which describe what happens, theories provide the underlying reasons for why things happen.
A scientific law and a scientific theory are both essential components of the scientific method, but they serve different purposes. A scientific law describes a consistent and observable phenomenon, often expressed mathematically, while a scientific theory explains the underlying mechanisms and reasons behind those phenomena. Both are based on extensive empirical evidence and can be tested and refined over time, but laws summarize what happens, whereas theories provide explanations for why it happens.
Illogical question captain!!
They are not the same, theory is just that, it may be provable in some instances, but cannot be positivity applied to all cases, law however can. Their similarity is that they both require some proof, but law needs to be proven to be true for all cases.
Your question needs rephrasing; as it stands, it makes no sense.
Science is concerned with HOW a thing happens, not who, when, or why something happens. It is not the least bit involved in subjective questions, politics, religion, philosophy, art, emotions, love and joy....unless the question is how these things happen physically.So it is a scientific question to ask, "how did Rome destroy Carthage." But not "WHY Rome destroyed carthage".By NOT being stupid....
Some types of salt melts the snow
An increase in current will only affect resistance if it causes the temperature of the conductor to change. For pure metallic conductors, and increase in temperature will cause an increase in resistance.
Scientific laws describe how natural phenomena behave consistently under certain conditions. They do not explain why things happen or the underlying mechanisms behind the observed behavior. Theories, on the other hand, provide explanations based on tested hypotheses and are used to understand the causes behind observed phenomena.
Scientific laws are concise statements that describe consistent and universal relationships observed in nature, often expressed mathematically. They are based on repeated experimental observations and are universally applicable under specified conditions. Unlike theories, which provide explanations for phenomena, laws describe what happens without delving into the underlying reasons. Scientific laws are always subject to testing and can be refined or revised as new evidence emerges.
Current is at maximum
Scientific laws describe how a natural phenomenon behaves under certain conditions, based on repeated observations and experiments. They do not explain why a phenomenon occurs, but rather they provide mathematical relationships and generalizations that help predict outcomes. The "why" is typically answered by scientific theories, which offer explanations for the underlying causes and mechanisms behind the observed patterns described by the laws.
A scientific law is a statement that describes a consistent and universal relationship observed in nature, often formulated through repeated experimentation and observation. It summarizes a pattern or principle that can predict outcomes under specific conditions, typically expressed mathematically. Unlike theories, which provide explanations for phenomena, laws describe what happens without delving into why it occurs.