A collection of hypotheses that have been repeatedly tested and are supported by a great deal of evidence is called a scientific theory. Scientific theories integrate and summarize a wide range of observations and experimental results, providing a coherent explanation for a phenomenon. They are subject to continual testing and refinement as new evidence emerges.
TRUE
A collection of hypotheses that have been repeatedly tested and supported by substantial evidence is called a theory, not a prediction. Predictions are specific forecasts derived from theories and hypotheses about what will happen under certain conditions. Theories provide a broader understanding of a phenomenon and can generate multiple predictions.
Hypotheses are specific, testable predictions derived from a broader theoretical framework, often formulated before conducting experiments. In contrast, theories are well-substantiated explanations of natural phenomena that have been repeatedly tested and validated through extensive research and evidence. While hypotheses can be disproven or supported through experimentation, theories represent a more comprehensive understanding of a subject that integrates multiple hypotheses and findings over time.
Yes, hypotheses should be supported by evidence to be considered valid. Evidence helps to confirm or refute the hypothesis, guiding further research and understanding of the subject. In scientific inquiry, robust evidence strengthens the credibility of the hypothesis and contributes to the development of knowledge. Ultimately, without evidence, a hypothesis remains speculative and unsubstantiated.
A hypothesis is a specific, testable prediction about the relationship between variables, often formulated before conducting an experiment. In contrast, a theory is a well-substantiated explanation of an aspect of the natural world, supported by a body of evidence and repeatedly tested and confirmed through observation and experimentation. While hypotheses are often temporary and can be disproven, theories are broader in scope and can integrate multiple hypotheses and findings over time.
TRUE
A collection of hypotheses that have been repeatedly tested and supported by substantial evidence is called a theory, not a prediction. Predictions are specific forecasts derived from theories and hypotheses about what will happen under certain conditions. Theories provide a broader understanding of a phenomenon and can generate multiple predictions.
Hypotheses are specific, testable predictions derived from a broader theoretical framework, often formulated before conducting experiments. In contrast, theories are well-substantiated explanations of natural phenomena that have been repeatedly tested and validated through extensive research and evidence. While hypotheses can be disproven or supported through experimentation, theories represent a more comprehensive understanding of a subject that integrates multiple hypotheses and findings over time.
Mars
Yes, hypotheses should be supported by evidence to be considered valid. Evidence helps to confirm or refute the hypothesis, guiding further research and understanding of the subject. In scientific inquiry, robust evidence strengthens the credibility of the hypothesis and contributes to the development of knowledge. Ultimately, without evidence, a hypothesis remains speculative and unsubstantiated.
Phylogenetic hypotheses are strongest when they are supported by multiple lines of evidence, such as morphology, genetics, and fossil data. Additionally, hypotheses that are consistent with principles of evolutionary theory and show high levels of statistical support are considered strong.
A hypothesis is a specific, testable prediction about the relationship between variables, often formulated before conducting an experiment. In contrast, a theory is a well-substantiated explanation of an aspect of the natural world, supported by a body of evidence and repeatedly tested and confirmed through observation and experimentation. While hypotheses are often temporary and can be disproven, theories are broader in scope and can integrate multiple hypotheses and findings over time.
A theory is a set of ideas supported by evidence. It is a well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural world, based on a body of facts that have been repeatedly confirmed through observation and experimentation. Theories can evolve and change as new evidence is discovered.
A hypothesis or group of hypotheses that have been supported with repeated testing is summarized as a theory. A theory is a well-substantiated explanation of an aspect of the natural world that has been validated through extensive empirical evidence and experimentation. It provides a framework for understanding observations and predicting outcomes, and it remains open to modification or rejection as new evidence emerges.
The addition of molecular evidence supported the hypothesis made earlier based on structural evidence. Molecular evidence provides additional data that can confirm or strengthen hypotheses that are based on structural evidence.
Scientific facts are observations that have been repeatedly confirmed through experimentation and empirical evidence. They are typically derived from the scientific method, which involves making hypotheses, conducting experiments, collecting data, and drawing conclusions. For instance, the fact that water boils at 100 degrees Celsius at sea level is supported by consistent experimental results. Such facts are subject to revision if new evidence emerges, emphasizing the dynamic nature of scientific understanding.
You have it backwards. Theories are supported by evidence. Evidence is not supported by theories, evidence is simply observed.