A good negative control in a science experiment is a setup that lacks the experimental treatment or intervention but is otherwise treated the same as the experimental group. This helps to ensure that any observed effects in the experimental group can be attributed to the treatment rather than other factors. For example, in a drug efficacy study, a placebo group receiving no active medication serves as the negative control. This allows researchers to determine if changes in the experimental group are due to the drug itself rather than psychological or environmental influences.
Adequate means good enough. It means the same thing in a science experiment as it does in any other context.
The control is whatever you base your experiment on. No control = you can't compare your data to anything = good luck making sense out of your experiment. You aren't following the scientific method if there is no control.
A good science experiment is a holdable fireball. It is sort of difficult though, but this is the link http://video.about.com/chemistry/Handheld-Fireballs.htm
You need a control for any experiment. It doesn't sound like this particular experiment is of the utmost importance but it's a good habit to get into if you plan more important ones. I have no idea what the control would be.
Sweet or Sour, A Lemon Experiment
a good science experiment is a 3d plant cell model
good "science" or a good experiment can always be repeated with the same result
A good science experiment involves a good subject of investigation, that is worth looking into, and a logical design that will produce meaningful results.
yess i did a science experiment on it
food processing
a good science experiment for 6th graders that is fun is making insta snow its fun and inexpensive
Adequate means good enough. It means the same thing in a science experiment as it does in any other context.
good conductor
The control is whatever you base your experiment on. No control = you can't compare your data to anything = good luck making sense out of your experiment. You aren't following the scientific method if there is no control.
A volcano, or make a electric car, or a vinigar and baking powder experiment.
The control is whatever you base your experiment on. No control = you can't compare your data to anything = good luck making sense out of your experiment. You aren't following the scientific method if there is no control.
Hot Head Peak