A "hypothesis".
A hypothesis.
There is no such thing as "scientific method for hypertension". The scientific method is a process, utilization of which leads to rational, testable explanations for natural phenomena. Hypertension is an ailment.
A hypothesis (hie-poth-uh-sis) is a testable idea that leads to scientific explanation In other words its what you think is going to happen in your experiment before you actually start it.
True scientific models must all lead to testable hypotheses; otherwise, they are unverifiable and not so different than speculation. Note that some scientific models may not be testable at the time they are proposed if the technology of that time is not available to conduct proper tests. Sometimes, the work that goes into figuring out ways of testing new hypotheses leads to the invention of new instruments or the design of new machines that can end up having benefits greater than what they were originally designed for.
In the realm of scientific inquiry, making an observation typically leads to formulating questions or hypotheses based on the observed phenomena. This initial step is crucial as it guides the direction of further investigation and experimentation. Subsequently, researchers design experiments to test these hypotheses, ultimately contributing to the development of theories and a deeper understanding of the subject matter. Thus, observation serves as the foundation for the scientific method.
A hypothesis.
hypothesis
the answer is hypothesis
There is no such thing as "scientific method for hypertension". The scientific method is a process, utilization of which leads to rational, testable explanations for natural phenomena. Hypertension is an ailment.
A hypothesis (hie-poth-uh-sis) is a testable idea that leads to scientific explanation In other words its what you think is going to happen in your experiment before you actually start it.
Religion basically states "the world is as it is because God made it that way". If you prefer an answer that has a bit more of reasoning to it, then you'll probably like the scientific explanation - which tries hard to do away with the "because" answer - better.
True scientific models must all lead to testable hypotheses; otherwise, they are unverifiable and not so different than speculation. Note that some scientific models may not be testable at the time they are proposed if the technology of that time is not available to conduct proper tests. Sometimes, the work that goes into figuring out ways of testing new hypotheses leads to the invention of new instruments or the design of new machines that can end up having benefits greater than what they were originally designed for.
You put your finger on important part of a scientific investigation. How widely should we search for an explanation?A couple of important assumptions are thata) the rules (of physics, chemistry, ...) remain constant over a long time; andb) that cause and effect follow in that order.One useful approach is to examine the counter argument - to put the proposition in the reverse. In math, this is often done by the reducto ad absurdum method - to show that the counter assumption leads by logic to an absurd conclusion.Always an early effort is to determine that the observation is correct, and that it may be observed repeatably.Hope that helps.
True scientific models must all lead to testable hypotheses; otherwise, they are unverifiable and not so different than speculation. Note that some scientific models may not be testable at the time they are proposed if the technology of that time is not available to conduct proper tests. Sometimes, the work that goes into figuring out ways of testing new hypotheses leads to the invention of new instruments or the design of new machines that can end up having benefits greater than what they were originally designed for.
In the realm of scientific inquiry, making an observation typically leads to formulating questions or hypotheses based on the observed phenomena. This initial step is crucial as it guides the direction of further investigation and experimentation. Subsequently, researchers design experiments to test these hypotheses, ultimately contributing to the development of theories and a deeper understanding of the subject matter. Thus, observation serves as the foundation for the scientific method.
Backstopping protects the investigator by verifying information and ensuring its accuracy. It helps prevent false leads or misinformation from affecting the investigation’s integrity.
It leads to the process of the scientific theory. :)