To make "the most correctable solution"
In an experiment investigators apply treatments to experimental units (people, animals, plots of land, etc.) and then proceed to observe the effect of the treatments on the experimental units. n an observational study investigators observe subjects and measure variables of interest without assigning treatments to the subjects. The treatment that each subject receives is determined beyond the control of the investigator. For example, suppose we want to study the effect of smoking on lung capacity in women. Summary: 1.The main difference between observational study and experiments is in the way the observation is done. 2.In an experiment, the researcher will undertake some experiment and not just make observations. In observational study, the researcher simply makes an observation and arrives at a conclusion. 3.In observational study, no experiment is conducted. In this type of study the researcher relies more on data collected. 4.In an experiment, the researcher observes things through various studies. 5.There is human intervention in experiments whereas there is no human intervention in observational study. 6.Hawthorne studies are a good example for experiments. 7.The study to determine the relation between smoking and lung cancer is a typical example for observational study.
in vivo
In an observational study, a scientist will never draw attention to himself or herself. They will also not attempt to randomize a study.
Observational and experimental data are almost always recorded and analyzed in numerical form.
In Vivo
in an experiment, the researcher manipulates a variable
In an experiment, the researcher manipulates a variable.
cause and effect
designed experiment
In a controlled experiment, researchers manipulate variables to observe their effect on outcomes, while in an observational study, researchers observe natural variations in variables without manipulating them. Controlled experiments allow for stronger causal inferences compared to observational studies because they can establish cause-and-effect relationships.
change one or more factors and observe the effects
To make "the most correctable solution"
is it: observational learning ? imprinting ? landmarks ?
Unlike an observational study, an experiment allows researchers to establish a cause-and-effect relationship between variables. This is because experiments involve the manipulation of variables to observe their impact on the outcome of interest, helping to establish a direct link between the intervention and the results.
An experiment is a controlled procedure used to test a hypothesis, whereas an observational study involves observing and recording data without intervening. Experimental studies involve manipulating variables, while observational studies do not involve manipulation and only observe existing conditions. Experimental studies are used to establish cause-and-effect relationships, while observational studies can only show correlation.
Observational classification is based on what you see and observe about the thing (maybe during an experiment) While theoretical classification is based on what you are being taught or what you have been taught or what you read about the thing.