0
What else can I help you with?
What is an example of a simple present tense in general truth?
The sun rises in the east
How is scientific observation different from a persons opinion?
A scientific observation is simply what someone has seen but does not (by itself) say anything more. Scientific observations are used to formulate theories and these theories you might call "provisional facts". So, a theory is like a fact that can be overturned by a new observation and causes a newer and better theory to be formulated. After lots of observation the "provisional facts" become clearer and clearer and we get closer to "truth". A scientist's opinion (on a scientific subject) is based on the current theory which in turn is supported by all the observations that have ever been made. A person's opinion is not an observation. It is a conclusion based on what that person believes. Some opinions can not be proven to be wrong (or right). Different people can have different opinions based on the same observations. So, an opinion can only be shown to be wrong if there is evidence to show it is wrong - and a scientific observation is an example of how this can be done. To understand this some more, compare the scientific theory of evolution with creationist views about evolution. Both use the same observations and they disagree. Scientists use all existing observations to formulate theories and the latest and best theory is used to form their opinions because it is the one that accounts for all existing observations successfully. However, creationists start with an opinion about how evolution happened based on the Bible, then selectively ignore observations that conflict with their opinion.
How do scientists experiment that this is scientific truth?
all scientists hav different attitudes,mind and behaviour they do researches like their personality bt they all follow the basic principles and scientifc steps thts made standard for all..................... some basic steps includes................. 1 observations 2 hypotthsis 3 experiments 4 theory 5 law
How is a hypothesis different than a theory?
Hypothesis: A supposition or proposed explanation made on the basis of limited evidence as a starting point for further investigation. Theory: A scientifically acceptable general principle or body of principles offered to explain phenomena; a hypothesis assumed and accepted as truth
What are two differences between pseudoscience and science?
Science uses rigorous reasoning; pseudoscience uses sloppy reasoning. Science is a sincere effort to discover truth, whatever that truth may be; pseudoscience is used to sell fraudulent products, and is not actually concerned with truth.
What argument is characterized by its support rather than its ability to prove its conclusion?
An inductive argument is characterized by its support rather than its ability to conclusively prove its conclusion. Inductive reasoning involves drawing general conclusions based on specific observations or evidence, which may support a conclusion but not guarantee its truth.
What is an interrogative sentence with the word reinforce?
must i reinforce to you the importance of telling the truth
What is the name of short observations?
The name of short observations is "aphorisms." These are brief statements that express a general truth or insight. Examples include "less is more" or "actions speak louder than words."
What is an invalid argument?
In invalid argument is one in which the premises do not necessitate the truth of the conclusion. An argument's validity or invalidity does NOT depend on the actual truth of the premises, just what they would entail IF they are true.
The number of sides in an argument?
There are 3 sides in an argument... The two people and the truth.
Which is the best description of inductive thinking?
Inductive thinking involves making generalizations based on specific observations or examples. It involves moving from specific instances to broad generalizations without guaranteeing the truth of the conclusion.
If an argument is valid, then what is the key factor that determines its soundness?
The key factor that determines the soundness of an argument is the truth of its premises.
The truth is always the strongest argument?
While truth holds significant power, the strength of an argument also depends on how it is presented, supported by evidence, and the audience's receptiveness. Emphasizing truth can enhance credibility and persuade others, but effective communication and reasoning are crucial components for a compelling argument. Ultimately, the strength of an argument relies on a combination of truth, logic, evidence, and persuasive delivery.
How do you identify a strong or weak argument?
A valid argument is one in which the truth of the premises guarantees the truth of its conclusion. An invalid argument is one in which the truth of the premises does not guarantee the truth of the conclusion. In invalid arguments, the conclusion does not follow with strict necessity from the premises, even though it is claimed to.
What factors contribute to the soundness of a deductive argument?
The soundness of a deductive argument is determined by the validity of its logical structure and the truth of its premises. If the argument is logically valid and the premises are true, then the argument is considered sound.
What will the The truth table for a valid deductive argument show?
The truth table for a valid deductive argument will show that when the premises are true, the conclusion is also true. It will demonstrate that the argument follows the rules of deductive logic and the conclusion necessarily follows from the premises.
What is the premises of an argument?
It is the truth because I say it is.
