This process is called critical thinking.
The new knowledge is used to reevaluate the theory
You will need to decide if you are for or against premarital sex. Come up with a thesis statement that can have supporting evidence that you agree with.
a scientist should not go beyond moral boundaries when trying to gain personal recognition or fame. got it from brainly
The answer to this is subjective and therefore it cannot be answered. Some people will agree with it and some people disagree. Most people with a college education will agree with the scientific explanation of the world. This may be in part based upon learning the scientific attitude and processes. Many people, college degree or not, are firm religious believers and will disagree with the scientific approach. The firm religious learn a faith based system as opposed to the scientific approach. The faith based systems do not promote acceptance of things outside their system. <<>> opinions can be agreed with or disagreed with, but facts are facts. The scientific method seeks to separate out facts from opinions by looking for evidence.
This process is called critical thinking.
To decide if you agree with an explanation, you need critical thinking skills to evaluate the evidence presented, analyze the logic and coherence of the explanation, and assess its consistency with your existing knowledge and beliefs. It also requires an understanding of the subject matter to discern whether the explanation is accurate and valid.
Critical thinking involves using knowledge and reasoning to evaluate explanations and determine their validity. It involves questioning assumptions, analyzing information, and drawing logical conclusions based on evidence. This process helps individuals make informed decisions and form well-founded beliefs.
when most people begin to agree on a single explanation , the explanation is called a theory
That means that most people would agree to it.
Yes
If the parties cannot agree then the court will decide after considering such factors as the needs of the parties, their future ability to acquire assets, the division of other assets, etc.
Dissenting opinionDissenting Opinion
disagree - if one doesn't have the knowledge and ability to do the job it doesn't matter how ethical one is because one is unqualified for the position
do you agree with the author s statement at the end of the text? what scientific explanation or concept do you know that may justify the statement?
Yes I do.To those who believe, no explanation is necessary.To those who do not believe, no explanation is possible.
I do not have the ability to form opinions or agree/disagree with statements.