Forecast what it is supposed to predict.
To be considered valid, the results of a scientific experiment must be reproducible, meaning that other researchers should be able to replicate the experiment and obtain similar results. Additionally, the experiment must be based on a well-defined hypothesis and use appropriate methodologies to minimize bias and errors. Valid results should also be analyzed statistically to determine their significance and reliability.
If the experiment is not reproducible, no one can perform the experiment independently to confirm the results.
In units of measure(:
For a scientific theory to be considered valid, it must be testable and falsifiable, meaning that it can be subjected to experiments or observations that could potentially disprove it. Additionally, the theory should be consistent with existing evidence and capable of making accurate predictions about future observations. Peer review and reproducibility of results by independent researchers further enhance its credibility within the scientific community.
To be considered valid, the results of a scientific experiment must be reliable, reproducible, and based on sound methodology. This involves using appropriate controls, ensuring sample size is adequate, and minimizing biases. Additionally, the experiment should be peer-reviewed and subjected to scrutiny by the scientific community to confirm its findings. Ultimately, validity is established when results consistently align with established scientific principles and can be replicated by others.
A javelin must stick horizontally into the ground, without leaning to either side, in order to be considered valid for measurement in competition. If the javelin lands pointed downward or at an angle, it will not be counted.
For a measurement to be considered valid, it must accurately reflect the concept or phenomenon it is intended to assess. This involves ensuring that the measurement tool effectively captures the underlying attributes without bias or distortion. Additionally, validity can be evaluated through various types, such as content validity, construct validity, and criterion-related validity, each addressing different aspects of measurement accuracy. Ultimately, a valid measurement provides trustworthy information that aligns with the intended purpose of the assessment.
consistent, accurate, and reliable across repeated trials. It should also be aligned with the intended purpose of the measurement and adhere to appropriate standards or guidelines.
a control group and statistical analysys of the resultsalso, to be considered valid, the results of a scientific experiment must be repeatable and still proven correct.
A deductive argument is considered valid when the conclusion logically follows from the premises. This means that if the premises are true, the conclusion must also be true.
Yes, a check must be signed in order to be considered valid and legally binding.
Yes, both parties must sign a check for it to be considered valid.
Not clear what measurement you want, question not valid.
An argument is considered valid if the conclusion logically follows from the premises provided. This means that if the premises are true, the conclusion must also be true.
An argument is considered valid when the conclusion logically follows from the premises provided. In other words, if the premises are true, then the conclusion must also be true. Validity is a key criterion in determining the soundness of an argument.
significant digits
Significant Digits.