0
Because he proved it was wrong. (women can't be scientist dummy)
You are a scientist and you are trying to prove through the Scientific Method why there aren't any football players who played college ball at Duke in the National Football League. Your hypothesis is that players from schools that start with D can't make it into the NFL. After you find there's a guy playing for the Tennessee Titans who played at Dartmouth, you've proven your initial hypothesis wrong, so you change it: Players from North Carolina schools can't make it into the NFL. There's a bunch of guys playing in the NFL who were NC State players, which also negates your third hypothesis about Atlantic Coast Conference players not getting into the NFL. I have faith that eventually you'll come to the correct hypothesis--that Duke players don't get into the NFL because Duke's football team sucks.
What else can I help you with?
Why might a scientist rethink their hypothesis?
The scientists might Rethink there Hypothesis because when they collect more data they would know more about what they are doing so they would rethink there hypothesis
When a scientist makes an educated guess about what the right answer to a science experiment might be?
This is called a hypothesis.
Why do scientist form hypothesis?
A scientist forms hypothesis to better conduct an experiment. He or she asks a question, then forms a hypothesis, or prediction, so that they are better prepared for a likely outcome of their experiment. If they don't try to guess what might happen, they might not come prepared and could be injured or unsucessful in their collection of data.
Why would a scientist change their hypothesis?
In the face of evidence. A Hypothesis is an idea about how something works or will work. Once a test is performed (normally an experiment or a set of observations) then the hypothesis might need to be "refined" or changed to explain the new data. Once a Hypothesis survives all the experiments that people can throw, by correctly predicting their outcomes, then it becomes the "Accepted Theory" for the problem.
What could cause scientist to change the information on branching tree diagram on the future?
It could be the result of better information, a new model or both. Alternatively, the scientist might be modelling different scenarios.
What is the hypothesis of the strange case of beriberi?
Scientist thought it might be cause by bacteria.
Why might scientist sometimes need to change their belief about is true?
cause
Why might a scientist rethink their hypothesis?
The scientists might Rethink there Hypothesis because when they collect more data they would know more about what they are doing so they would rethink there hypothesis
What is the word for a testable statement used for making predictions and carrying out further experiments?
A testable statement used for making predictions and carrying out further experiments is called a hypothesis. The hypothesis might change as the scientist continues to test his or her theory.
When a scientist makes an educated guess about what the right answer to a science experiment might be?
This is called a hypothesis.
Hypothesis about avocado?
A hypothesis is a question that a scientist comes up with, which will later form the basis of experiments or testing which will attempt to answer the hypothesis. For an avocado, an interesting hypothesis might be, 'Will the pit of an avocado grow hydroponically?'
What do scientist revive before forming hypothesis?
Revivification is not particularly associated with the process of forming a hypothesis. Speculatively, a scientist might revive his or her own imagination before venturing a hypothesis. But then, that would presume that the imagination had previously become dormant, and there is no reason to think that.
Why do scientist form hypothesis?
A scientist forms hypothesis to better conduct an experiment. He or she asks a question, then forms a hypothesis, or prediction, so that they are better prepared for a likely outcome of their experiment. If they don't try to guess what might happen, they might not come prepared and could be injured or unsucessful in their collection of data.
What hypothesis might another scientist suggest to Harte for the decrease in the number of salamander?
Another scientist might suggest the hypothesis that an increase in predation by natural predators of salamanders could be causing the decrease in their numbers. This could be investigated by studying predator populations, their behavior, and their interaction with salamanders in the ecosystem.
Why would a scientist change their hypothesis?
In the face of evidence. A Hypothesis is an idea about how something works or will work. Once a test is performed (normally an experiment or a set of observations) then the hypothesis might need to be "refined" or changed to explain the new data. Once a Hypothesis survives all the experiments that people can throw, by correctly predicting their outcomes, then it becomes the "Accepted Theory" for the problem.
Why would scientist change their hypothesis?
In the face of evidence. A Hypothesis is an idea about how something works or will work. Once a test is performed (normally an experiment or a set of observations) then the hypothesis might need to be "refined" or changed to explain the new data. Once a Hypothesis survives all the experiments that people can throw, by correctly predicting their outcomes, then it becomes the "Accepted Theory" for the problem.
What could cause scientist to change the information on branching tree diagram on the future?
It could be the result of better information, a new model or both. Alternatively, the scientist might be modelling different scenarios.
