0
What hypothesis might another scientist suggest to Harte for the decrease in the number of salamander?
Another scientist might suggest the hypothesis that an increase in predation by natural predators of salamanders could be causing the decrease in their numbers. This could be investigated by studying predator populations, their behavior, and their interaction with salamanders in the ecosystem.
What else can I help you with?
What is another term used to describe a hypothesis?
A conjecture is another term used to describe a hypothesis. It is an educated guess or a proposed explanation for a phenomenon based on limited evidence.
What is another word for plant scientist?
plantologist :)
Why might one scientist repeat the work of another?
A scientist might repeat the work of another to verify the results for accuracy and reliability, to build upon the previous research and validate its findings, or to identify any potential errors or biases in the original study.
Which of the might be a valid hypothesis for why a plant appears to be dying?
One possible hypothesis could be that the plant is not receiving enough sunlight, leading to a lack of photosynthesis and reduced growth. Another hypothesis could be that the plant is being overwatered or underwatered, causing stress to the roots and affecting nutrient uptake. Additionally, a potential hypothesis could be that the plant is experiencing a pest infestation or disease, which is impacting its health.
What is a hypothesis to prove that eating garlic prevents colds?
A hypothesis to prove that eating garlic prevents colds could be: "Consuming garlic daily for a period of 3 months will result in fewer instances of cold symptoms compared to those who do not consume garlic." This hypothesis suggests that the regular intake of garlic may boost the immune system and reduce the likelihood of catching a cold.
What options does a scientist have if experiment does not support hypothesis?
a scientist can do another experiment or change their hypothesis.
What do scientist do when a hypothesis is not supported by an experiment?
Scientists then state another hypothesis and test it out with another experiment.
What is another name for salamander?
another name for a salamander is a newt or siren. the scientific name for a salamander is a Ambystoma maculatum. The "Cave Salamander" or "White Salamander" is known as the Olm.
What is another name for a newt?
its an aquatic salamander (salamander that lives in water)
Why is A hypothesis important?
putting a certain hypothesis is important for the person making a certain experiment.For exampe,if s/he were a scientist,the hypothesis would help in knowing what experiments should be done(in another words,NO hypothesis-->NO experiments will be done).
Why is formulating a hypothesis important?
putting a certain hypothesis is important for the person making a certain experiment.For exampe,if s/he were a scientist,the hypothesis would help in knowing what experiments should be done(in another words,NO hypothesis-->NO experiments will be done).
When the evidence in a scientific experiment does not support the hypothesis what should the scientist do?
When the evidence in a scientific experiment does not support the hypothesis the scientist:Confirm through repeated experimentation that the evidence is validReject the hypothesisDevelop another hypothesis that is consistent with the valid evidence
What is contintel drift?
A hypothesis proposed by German scientist Alfred wegner which states the continents have moved, or drifted, from one location to another over time.
What is your next step if your data doesn't support your hypothesis?
Propose another hypothesis; the hypothesis is revised and another experiment is conducted.
Why is collaboration of scientist is necessary for the process of scientific study?
The most important reason is if a single scientist forms a hypothesis and it is proved by his or her experiment it is still only a hypothesis. Other scientists need to repeat the experiment in every way conceivable to either prove or disprove the hypothesis. Only after the hypothesis has stood up to such scrutiny may it become a theory recognized by the scientific community. Another reason is that some research is simply too daunting and complex for a single person to complete.
If the data doesn't support your hypothesis what should you do?
Regroup and propose another theory Propose another hypothesis
Is another scientist work still valid if their hypothesis is dis proven?
Yes, a scientist's work can still be valid even if their hypothesis is disproven. Scientific inquiry often involves testing hypotheses, and disproving a hypothesis can lead to new insights and questions that advance understanding. The process of exploration and experimentation is fundamental to science, and learning from incorrect hypotheses is crucial for progress. Disproven hypotheses can still contribute to the body of knowledge and inform future research directions.
