A good example of observation and inference could be a scenario where you see dark clouds gathering in the sky (observation). From this, you might infer that it is likely to rain soon. The observation is based on visual evidence, while the inference is a conclusion drawn from that evidence, predicting future weather conditions.
Observing a change in state of matter is a observation that could be made and recorded.
Observation helps scientists gather an collect data, which without, their experiment(s) could not exist
He could not draw a conclusion on the basis of conversation. This is an example using the phrase draw a conclusion.
By observing and analyzing information give to us we infer or conclude an outcome. It's an inference.
Direct observation is an observation in which you have complete view and capability to observe and experiment with an object- hope i could help
If the object does not exhibit biological processes such as growth, reproduction, response to stimuli, or metabolism, it could be concluded that it is non-living. Additionally, if the object does not contain cells or genetic material, that would also indicate that it is non-living.
A good example of observation and inference could be a scenario where you see dark clouds gathering in the sky (observation). From this, you might infer that it is likely to rain soon. The observation is based on visual evidence, while the inference is a conclusion drawn from that evidence, predicting future weather conditions.
You can study the unknown object under the microscope and look for characteristics like movement, cell structure, and organization. If you observe patterns that suggest the object has cells, shows growth, or displays other biological characteristics, it likely comes from a living thing. If it lacks these features and appears more like abiotic matter, it is likely nonliving.
Cells came from nonliving things.or Cells could generate spontaneously.
spontaneous generation
A qualitative observation for a penny could be that it is round, small, and made of metal.
Spontaneous Generation
spontaneous generation
no water and something else
nonliving is like the ocean the ocean doesnt breathe and the ocean doesnt talk living is like animals like humens we could talk we could write and breathe but does the ocean knows how to do that? No i dont think so so now you know what nonliving and whats living
He failed to recognize that pure logic could not always bring him to correct conclusions. One example of this was his conclusion that one object twice as massive as another object would fall to the ground in half the time. This seemed logical to him and frankly it also seems intuitively reasonable to us today, particularly if we are not in on the truth. This is complicated a little by questions of air resistance and by the shape and density of the objects, but all things being equal careful observation by Galileo proved Aristotle wrong.