0
What else can I help you with?
What is an example of useless hypothesis?
If a hypotesis is not formulated correctly, does not make sense and or does not help discover, infer or otherwise answer a question, it would theoretically be considered useless. Example: ice does not float. This would be an incorrect hypotesis as it answers its own question.
Is smoke is transparent?
No, smoke is not considered a transparent medium because it does not transmit rays of light through it. An example of a transparent medium would be glass.
Is there ever a good reason when it would be appropriate to perform an experiment without a control group?
Yes only when the experiment is obvious, for example, if I wanted to see what drink would be healthier for your body water or juice it is obvious that water is healthier because it contains no chemicals
Why would this be considered an example of expository writing apex?
Expository writing is characterized by its aim to inform, explain, or describe a topic clearly and logically. This example would be considered expository writing because it presents factual information, provides explanations, and uses a straightforward structure to convey its message without the influence of personal opinions or narratives. The primary goal is to enhance the reader's understanding of the subject matter.
What are the Examples of B2B B2C and C2C?
Belk Buying products from Nike is an example of B2B, Purchasing shoes from Nike is considered B2C and using an on-line auction website such as EBay to sell shoes to a 3rd Party would be considered C2C.
What would NOT be considered an example of an appropriate and reasonable accommodation?
Lowering performance expectations
What would not be considered an example of an appropriate reasonable accommodation?
Lowering performance expectations
Would not be considered an example of appropriate reasonable accommodations?
Lowering performance expectations
What is a Reasonable and prudent person?
A prudent person is considered to be one who is discreet or discerning to a great degree. A reasonable prudent person would then be one who does not go overboard with their prudence to the point of snobbishness, for example.
What would not be an appropriate topic for your personal statement?
Anything not about you would not be appropriate ... the weather, for example.
What is the elements of concept of reasonable limits?
A reasonable limit is the limit that a reasonable person would put on any quantifiable concept. For example a reasonable limit for working hours is eight hours a day, because a reasonable person would think that eight hours is a reasonable maximum. The concept of a reasonable person is enshrined in the legal system.
What is a reasonable suspect?
Reasonable suspicion is a standard used in criminal procedure. It can justify less-intrusive searches. For example, a reasonable suspicion justifies a stop and frisk, but not a full search. A reasonable suspicion exists when a reasonable person would, based upon specific facts, suspect that a crime has been committed.
What is a reasonable decimal answer for the sqrt of 200?
The sqrt of 200 is 14.14213562... But a 'reasonable' answer would be 14.1 This is because the question gives three digits of precision -- called significant figures -- so it is reasonable to give three digits in the answer. As another example, a reasonable decimal answer for the sqrt of 200.00 would be 14.142 (five figures in the question, five in the answer).
What is an example of something that would not be considered a natural hazard?
An unhealthy diet is not an example of a natural hazard.
Which product would be considered scarce?
One example of a product that would be considered scare would be Diet Cola with lemon in it.
Which defense would the skin would be an example of?
It is considered a surface barrier.
How is the standard of a duty of reasonable care determined?
The standard of a duty of reasonable care is determined based on what a hypothetical reasonable person would do in similar circumstances, taking into account factors such as the foreseeability of harm, the relationship between the parties, and the nature of the activity involved. Courts consider what actions would be considered reasonable and prudent under the specific circumstances of a case.
