The scientists might Rethink there Hypothesis because when they collect more data they would know more about what they are doing so they would rethink there hypothesis
When their hypothesis for the conducted experiment is accurate.
The scientists might Rethink there Hypothesis because when they collect more data they would know more about what they are doing so they would rethink there hypothesis
If a scientist's data fails to support their hypothesis, the next step would typically involve re-evaluating the experimental design and data collection methods to identify any potential errors or biases. They may also consider alternative explanations for the results and explore whether the hypothesis needs to be revised or refined. Further experimentation or additional data collection might be warranted to gain more insights. Ultimately, the scientist would document their findings and analysis, contributing to the broader scientific understanding of the topic.
yes because they didnt know how wegners inteligence was and they should have tried it in the firts place anyway it would have helped relize that his hypothesis waas correct when they dobt of him!
Discard or change the hypothesis
Discard or change the hypothesis
The scientists might Rethink there Hypothesis because when they collect more data they would know more about what they are doing so they would rethink there hypothesis
The scientist may review their methodology to identify potential errors or biases that may have affected the results. They may also consider conducting additional experiments or collecting more data to confirm the findings. Finally, they might revise the hypothesis or develop a new one based on the data.
When you are using the scientific method, you would try to imagine a hypothesis which explains an observation, but you might not succeed. A hypothesis that does not explain an observation would be considered a failed hypothesis. You would then need to invent a different hypothesis.
When their hypothesis for the conducted experiment is accurate.
That would depend on your hypothesis!
If their data supported their hypothesis, then they would make a conclusion.
If you develop an experiment that truly demonstrates that the hypothesis is wrong*, then the hypothesis will lose its acceptance in the scientific community.* Such an experiment would have to be repeatable by other scientists AND accepted by interested scientists as a proof that the hypothesis is wrong.
The scientist could reevaluate the hypothesis, consider alternate explanations for the results, or modify the experimental design to address potential limitations. It is also important to replicate the study to confirm the findings and consult with colleagues for insights.
The scientists might Rethink there Hypothesis because when they collect more data they would know more about what they are doing so they would rethink there hypothesis
You would do the experiment. Ex. If chocolate is given to kids then, there heartbeat will be faster. To test the hypothesis you have to give chocolate to kids, then measure there heartbeat.