0
What else can I help you with?
How would you design an experiment to prove or disprove the hypothesis?
By testing your results, and explain in your conclusion what went wrong
A science researcher is reviewing another scientist's experiment and conclusion the reviewer would most likely consider the experiment invalid if?
it contains conclusions not explained by the evidence given
Why do scientists write conclusions to experiments?
The conclusion is the goal of performing the experiment, without it the written results of the experiment would only be a "jumble of data". Other scientists need the conclusion both to validate the experimenter's reasoning and to decide on future experimental directions to take.
What would a scientist do after forming a testable question?
He would develop an experiment. He has already made his hypothesis, he already drew his conclusion, and has already analyzed his data. To develop an experiment is the last possible thing for him to do. Good luck on whatever you needed this for hun. ;)
What would be a logical conclusion for kaylas experiment?
To provide a logical conclusion for Kayla's experiment, one would need to evaluate the results against her initial hypothesis. If the data supports her hypothesis, she could conclude that her experimental conditions had the expected effect. Conversely, if the results contradict her hypothesis, she may need to reconsider her methodology or explore alternative explanations. Overall, the conclusion should summarize the findings and suggest potential implications or future research directions.
What does conclusion and disscusion mean in a science fair?
Conclusion is what you would find at the end of the experiment. The judges would use it as such "What was your conclusion?"
What would you call a liquid at the end of a experiment?
The liquid at the end of an experiment would typically be referred to as the "final solution" or "remaining liquid." It might also be specifically labeled based on its composition or purpose in the experiment.
What is the conclusion on specific heat capacity of liquid experiment?
The conclusion of a specific heat capacity of liquid experiment typically involves determining the amount of heat required to raise the temperature of a known mass of the liquid by a certain amount. By measuring the initial and final temperatures and applying the formula Q = mcΔT (where Q is the heat energy, m is the mass, c is the specific heat capacity, and ΔT is the temperature change), the specific heat capacity of the liquid can be calculated. The conclusion would summarize the findings of the experiment, including the specific heat capacity value obtained and any sources of error that may have impacted the results.
In which part of the scientific method do you evaluate your experiment?
I would have to say Research/Data, or Conclusion.
What would be the best liquid to use for a science experiment?
water
By doing the scientific ways to find out if your cola will stay colder in a bottle or can what is your experiment?
your experiment would be to state the problem,make an hypothesis,research,analyze,experiment,then comes your conclusion
How would you design an experiment to prove or disprove the hypothesis?
By testing your results, and explain in your conclusion what went wrong
How can you tell if the conclusion from an experiment is valid?
If you documented all your results, had a partner, had a witness, completed the experiment many times with the same results, and tested the experiment on the proper things then this would be good validation.
When you make a conclusion about an experiment what must you also at consider?
The Accuracy of the results.The Validity of the experiment (does it work as planned and actually reflect your question)The Repeatability. (if you - and especially others - cant repeat it then it is not valid conclusion)Possible Variables that would effect the result.
What is the conclusion for experiment pollen germination?
The conclusion of an experiment on pollen germination would typically summarize the findings related to how different factors or variables impact the germination process, such as temperature, pH levels, or nutrient availability. It may also highlight any patterns or trends observed in the data, discuss any unexpected results, and offer insights into the conditions that promote or inhibit pollen germination.
A science researcher is reviewing another scientist's experiment and conclusion the reviewer would most likely consider the experiment invalid if?
it contains conclusions not explained by the evidence given
A science researcher is reviewing another scientists experiment and conclusion. the reviewer would most likely consider the experiment invalid if?
it contains conclusions not explained by the evidence given
