Wiki User
∙ 11y agoInstead of all the liquids mixing together, they form separate layers like a rainbow. They go in order with most dense on the bottom, and least dense on the top. When you do this experiment, you can use food coloring to differentiate the different liquids.
Wiki User
∙ 11y agoAda Yu
By testing your results, and explain in your conclusion what went wrong
it contains conclusions not explained by the evidence given
The conclusion is the goal of performing the experiment, without it the written results of the experiment would only be a "jumble of data". Other scientists need the conclusion both to validate the experimenter's reasoning and to decide on future experimental directions to take.
He would develop an experiment. He has already made his hypothesis, he already drew his conclusion, and has already analyzed his data. To develop an experiment is the last possible thing for him to do. Good luck on whatever you needed this for hun. ;)
Scientists write a conclusion after an experiment. The conclusion will summarize the details of the experiment, and whether or not the hypothesis tested was correct. A scientific paper published in a peer-reviewed journal is where the rationale, methods and materials, results and conclusions for a scientific experiment are reported. At the beginning of the paper or article (the terms are interchangeable), most journals require an abstract, which summarizes the experiment and results in a paragraph. There is no point in performing experiments or observations if you don't report on them, initially perhaps for your own use, or within the lab or institution or company; but more widely as a formal, peer-reviewed paper in an appropriate learned journal. In professional cases you are contractually obliged to write reports for your employers at least. It's what they pay you to do.
Conclusion is what you would find at the end of the experiment. The judges would use it as such "What was your conclusion?"
The liquid at the end of an experiment would typically be referred to as the "final solution" or "remaining liquid." It might also be specifically labeled based on its composition or purpose in the experiment.
The conclusion of an experiment on specific heat capacity of a liquid would typically summarize the findings regarding how much heat energy is required to raise the temperature of a unit mass of the liquid by one degree Celsius. It may also discuss any trends or patterns observed, the accuracy of the results obtained, and compare the experimental value to known literature values for specific heat capacity.
I would have to say Research/Data, or Conclusion.
water
your experiment would be to state the problem,make an hypothesis,research,analyze,experiment,then comes your conclusion
By testing your results, and explain in your conclusion what went wrong
If you documented all your results, had a partner, had a witness, completed the experiment many times with the same results, and tested the experiment on the proper things then this would be good validation.
The Accuracy of the results.The Validity of the experiment (does it work as planned and actually reflect your question)The Repeatability. (if you - and especially others - cant repeat it then it is not valid conclusion)Possible Variables that would effect the result.
The conclusion of an experiment on pollen germination would typically summarize the findings related to how different factors or variables impact the germination process, such as temperature, pH levels, or nutrient availability. It may also highlight any patterns or trends observed in the data, discuss any unexpected results, and offer insights into the conditions that promote or inhibit pollen germination.
it contains conclusions not explained by the evidence given
it contains conclusions not explained by the evidence given