The purpose of scientific method is to build confidence in one's ability draw conclusions. Having a standardized method makes the conclusions more reliable.
The term which is most applicable to the process of drawing conclusions based on facts gathered during an experiment would be analysis. You analyse your results.
By presenting data that contradict those conclusions
Scientific conclusions are based on scientific evidence.
It means that the results are in line with what you thought would happen, They do not prove your idea was wrong. (It doesn't mean the idea was definitely right, but it's the basis for more testing.)
the quotient would be wrong
Nothing would happen. It is not a material defect.Nothing would happen. It is not a material defect.Nothing would happen. It is not a material defect.Nothing would happen. It is not a material defect.
you would get the time of year wrong
It means that it can result in wrong conclusions.
Bad things.
The "wrong" man would be punished.Added: If both were indicted and tried for murder, how could the WRONG man be convicted?
The conclusions would be a summary of whatever you have discovered in relation to the subject.
A category mistake is a logical error where something is placed in the wrong category or group. This can happen in language or thought when a concept is misunderstood or misinterpreted, leading to confusion or incorrect conclusions.
the processor speed would be wrong. it would either be slower or it would be faster and yes. you could make it to fast and fry you processor.
Their conclusions could be wrong. -J.C.B.
"Misleading" means that it can easily make you draw wrong conclusions.
Tycho Brahe did not have the wrong conclusion about the motion of the planets. He was in fact very correct about his observations.