The experimental method that can prove cause and effect is the randomized controlled trial (RCT). In an RCT, participants are randomly assigned to either a treatment group or a control group, allowing researchers to isolate the effect of the independent variable while controlling for confounding factors. This design helps establish a causal relationship by demonstrating that changes in the dependent variable are a direct result of the manipulation of the independent variable. The randomization process ensures that differences between groups are minimized, enhancing the validity of the findings.
If you prove the cause, you at once prove the effect; and conversely nothing can exist without its cause.Smoking...Lung CancerAdultery....STDSinning...DeathDrinking....Liver DiseaseInternet....Time WasterEct. Ect. Ect.......
The scientific method cannot definitively prove a hypothesis; rather, it tests hypotheses through observation and experimentation. A hypothesis is formulated based on existing knowledge and then subjected to rigorous testing. If the experimental results consistently support the hypothesis, it gains credibility, but it remains open to revision or rejection based on new evidence. Ultimately, the scientific method allows for the refinement of hypotheses rather than absolute proof.
The advantage of the correlational research method is the ability to prove a positive or negative correlation between two subjects . The disadvantage of this is the unclear interpreation of cause and affect. moletsane
yes the scientific method does work . results of tests and expirements prove the accuracy of this method of uncovering science.
TRue
No a correlation method does not prove any kind of cause the only method that will prove Cause and Effect would be a Experiment Lab(hypothesis, Control group, Independent Variable ext...)
cause and effect
If you prove the cause, you at once prove the effect; and conversely nothing can exist without its cause.Smoking...Lung CancerAdultery....STDSinning...DeathDrinking....Liver DiseaseInternet....Time WasterEct. Ect. Ect.......
In a cause-and-effect essay, personal testimonies might be used as anecdotal evidence, that is as examples to prove or disprove the effectiveness of a cause.
An experiment can show: Cause and effect (Apex).
In order to prove that a cause-and-effect relationship exists, it is important to establish a clear correlation between the two variables, demonstrating that changes in one lead to changes in the other. Additionally, controlling for confounding variables is crucial to rule out alternative explanations. Employing a rigorous experimental design, such as randomized controlled trials, can strengthen the validity of the findings. Finally, replicating results across different contexts can further support the causal link.
To prove that the changes were due to the procedure, you would need to establish a cause-and-effect relationship by controlling other variables that could influence the outcome. This can be done through experimental design, statistical analysis, and replication of the results. Additionally, documenting the process and data collection methods can help support the claim that the changes were a result of the procedure.
The advantage of the correlational research method is the ability to prove a positive or negative correlation between two subjects . The disadvantage of this is the unclear interpreation of cause and affect. moletsane
The advantage of the correlational research method is the ability to prove a positive or negative correlation between two subjects . The disadvantage of this is the unclear interpreation of cause and affect. moletsane
A theory.
You answered your own question. To prove the cause of death.
how did they prove their result