0
What else can I help you with?
What is the difference in the way that a scientist and a historian use time periods?
Historians look more at the big picture than scientists who are concentrating on a specific problem
When was Robert Nadeau - science historian - born?
Robert Nadeau - science historian - was born in 1944.
What are the different logical steps in the scientific method?
The steps in the scientific method are: 1.Identification of problem 2.Formulation of hypothesis 4.Experimentation 4.Observation 5.Interpretation of data 6.Conclusion
What are the three i of investigation?
The three I's of investigation refer to Identification, Investigation, and Interpretation. Identification involves recognizing and defining the problem or incident that requires examination. Investigation encompasses the process of gathering evidence and analyzing data related to the identified issue. Finally, interpretation involves drawing conclusions from the evidence and analysis to understand the implications or to inform decision-making.
Who is person who studies how people lived in the past?
People who study how people lived in the past are called anthropologists.
What can influence a historian's interpretation?
A historian's interpretation can be influenced by their personal biases, cultural background, political beliefs, and the available evidence. Additionally, the historian's education, research methods, and the historical context in which they are working can also shape their interpretation.
What does a historian do when he or she points out problem with an argument?
The historian makes a counterclaim.
Is the historian more concerned with the interpretation than the accuracy of the data?
true
What is the best way to determine whether the historian's interpretation is valid?
If the question is: A historian is writing a book about the fall of the Soviet Union. He claims that the country collapsed because it spent too much of its money on its military rather than providing domestic services to its people. What is the best way to determine whether the historian’s interpretation is valid? Then the answer would be: Corroborate the interpretation with other secondary sources.
A historian's upbringing can influence their interpretation of historical events true or faulse?
True.
Is the historian is more concerned with the accuracy than the interpretation of the data?
Hell yeah
Can a historian's upbringing influence their interpretation of historical events?
A historian's upbringing can influence their interpretation of historical events; for example, a Jewish historian may have a more negative view of World War Two than another, due to the events (Jewish persecution) that took place during that time in history.
What explains why Historian A mentions the issue of slavery while Historian B does not?
Historian A wants to make the colonists appear in negative light by suggesting that they did not really believe in freedom for all
What does a historian require in order to make a valid historical interpretation about an event?
A historian requires a thorough examination of primary and secondary sources, ensuring the credibility and context of the evidence. Critical analysis of different perspectives and the consideration of biases in the sources are essential for a balanced interpretation. Additionally, understanding the socio-political context of the time period helps the historian make a more nuanced and valid interpretation of the event.
When was The Problem of Slavery in Western Culture created?
The Problem of Slavery in Western Culture was created in 1966.
True or falseThe historian is more concerned with the interpretation than the accuracy of the data?
Its Me The Bro Steelo And The Real Answer Is False
When was slavery abolished in Massachusetts?
Massachusetts was the first U.S. state to abolish slavery, in a 1783 judicial interpretation of its 1780 constitution.
