Because the men at the constitutional convention never considered getting rid of slavery
Historians look more at the big picture than scientists who are concentrating on a specific problem
Robert Nadeau - science historian - was born in 1944.
The steps in the scientific method are: 1.Identification of problem 2.Formulation of hypothesis 4.Experimentation 4.Observation 5.Interpretation of data 6.Conclusion
People who study how people lived in the past are called anthropologists.
There 6 different steps of scientific methods or processes: 1.Identification of problem 2.Formulation of hypothesis 4.Experimentation 4.Observation 5.Interpretation of data 6.Conclusion
A historian's interpretation can be influenced by their personal biases, cultural background, political beliefs, and the available evidence. Additionally, the historian's education, research methods, and the historical context in which they are working can also shape their interpretation.
The historian makes a counterclaim.
true
If the question is: A historian is writing a book about the fall of the Soviet Union. He claims that the country collapsed because it spent too much of its money on its military rather than providing domestic services to its people. What is the best way to determine whether the historian’s interpretation is valid? Then the answer would be: Corroborate the interpretation with other secondary sources.
True.
Hell yeah
A historian's upbringing can influence their interpretation of historical events; for example, a Jewish historian may have a more negative view of World War Two than another, due to the events (Jewish persecution) that took place during that time in history.
Historian A wants to make the colonists appear in negative light by suggesting that they did not really believe in freedom for all
The Problem of Slavery in Western Culture was created in 1966.
Massachusetts was the first U.S. state to abolish slavery, in a 1783 judicial interpretation of its 1780 constitution.
Its Me The Bro Steelo And The Real Answer Is False
The American Civil War was caused not by slavery but by economic factors.