If the experiment is not reproducible, no one can perform the experiment independently to confirm the results.
A reliable experiment is one that can be proven or has been worked out several times giving valid or dependable results.
Scientists make more mistakes than not. It is part of the business and why they call their work "experiments". As a working scientists you try to keep your basics constant. You control the pH of your solutions, the don't switch suppliers for even basic salts mid-experiment. Most importantly you repeat experiments several times and use statistical analysis to support your conclusions. The goal of scientist is to have his/her results confirmed by repetition by others. If it isn't reproducible than it isn't believable. But wrong conclusions.... Record your mistake in the results and talk about it in the conclusion/examination of data.
Because if scientists aren't open-minded, they could try to discredit or change the results of a valid experiment, or not accept a theory that may actually be right, and discredit the theory, therefore stopping progress in science.
A valid experiment is the one which is done on the basis of some facts and figures. The experiment which has a good statistical analysis is known to be valid experiment.step 3.
If the experiment is not reproducible, no one can perform the experiment independently to confirm the results.
A control is needed in a valid experiment because without controls then more then one variable is being tested. This can mess up the results.
If you documented all your results, had a partner, had a witness, completed the experiment many times with the same results, and tested the experiment on the proper things then this would be good validation.
A valid experiment is characterized by a clear hypothesis, a control group for comparison, random assignment of participants, and the ability to replicate the results. It should also have ethical considerations and controls in place to minimize bias and confounding variables.
Because then you can assess how valid your results are =D
A reliable experiment is one that can be proven or has been worked out several times giving valid or dependable results.
For the results of the experiment to be considered valid, a commonly accepted threshold is that they should be similar at least 70-80% of the time. This means that out of 17 trials, the results should align in at least 12 to 14 instances. Consistency in these results would bolster the reliability and validity of the experiment's findings.
a veterinarian
Scientists make more mistakes than not. It is part of the business and why they call their work "experiments". As a working scientists you try to keep your basics constant. You control the pH of your solutions, the don't switch suppliers for even basic salts mid-experiment. Most importantly you repeat experiments several times and use statistical analysis to support your conclusions. The goal of scientist is to have his/her results confirmed by repetition by others. If it isn't reproducible than it isn't believable. But wrong conclusions.... Record your mistake in the results and talk about it in the conclusion/examination of data.
To ensure an experiment's results are valid, you must conduct multiple trials to account for variability and increase reliability. This helps to minimize potential errors and ensure that the results are consistent and reproducible.
Because if scientists aren't open-minded, they could try to discredit or change the results of a valid experiment, or not accept a theory that may actually be right, and discredit the theory, therefore stopping progress in science.
The word is "methodology." It refers to the systematic approach or procedure followed in conducting an experiment to achieve reliable and valid results.