so others can repeat it and see if you did it right
So that you are NEVER confused at anytime within the conduction of the experiment.
So the experiment's results are more reliable
asasasa
So that results will be repeatable
If you do not have a control,then you cannot compare your test results.
So that you are NEVER confused at anytime within the conduction of the experiment.
When conflicting results occur in an experiment, it's important to first review the experimental procedures to check for any errors or inconsistencies. Next, analyze the data to identify any potential sources of variation or confounding factors that may be affecting the results. Finally, consider repeating the experiment with adjustments to the procedures or conditions to see if the conflicting results can be resolved.
Because a research study is necessary to be repeated, checked, confirmed.
I honestly think because they can do whatever they want to do its thier business not anyone else's .
So the experiment's results are more reliable
asasasa
An Experiment has no use without its documentation. Regarding this: The Lab Book; it contains - Protocol; Equipment; chemicals this and procedures that, compression of the results occurs in the Conclusion, while The Discussion is the Section of the Report that follows the Conclusion. {An experiment has no use without its documentation. Re: the Lab Book : Protocol; Equipment; chemicals this and procedures that, discussion of the results occurs in the Conclusion}.
Results that are consistent or reproducible across multiple trials are considered reliable in an experiment. These results should not change regardless of any variations in experimental conditions or procedures. Additionally, results that align with the expected outcomes based on the hypothesis and theoretical framework also typically remain constant.
So that results will be repeatable
experiment
If you do not have a control,then you cannot compare your test results.
Including a description of the procedures is crucial for scientific reproducibility. Other researchers should be able to replicate the experiment based on the provided procedures to validate the findings. It also allows for a clear evaluation of the methods used and ensures transparency in the scientific process.