I honestly think because they can do whatever they want to do its thier business not anyone else's .
No. Quality and accuracy are incredibly important to scientists. If an experiment is not performed with quality and accuracy it is not valid. However, if accuracy is not especially important, possibly because the result will be the same, then it can be ignored.
It is important for scientists to keep records to ensure reproducibility and transparency in their research. Keeping detailed records allows other researchers to verify findings and build on previous work. It also helps scientists track their progress, identify errors, and comply with regulations and ethical standards.
When scientists make a mistake, they acknowledge it, review their methods and data, and try to identify the source of the error. They may repeat the experiment to confirm or refute their findings, and may also consult with colleagues to get their perspective on the mistake and how to correct it. Learning from mistakes is an important part of the scientific process.
Yes it is. They need to keep records of experiments, like the process of the experiment, so they can repeat it again, and the results. This helps in further research they will do and that other scientists may do. Science is all about gaining and testing knowledge, so it is critical that they record their data.
They record data from their experiment from doing the experiment and record data while they are doing it......................example i am bouncing a ball on a carboard,tile,table and the carpet the cardboard is 8 the tile is 18 the table is 16 and the carpet is 19.
Because a research study is necessary to be repeated, checked, confirmed.
I honestly think because they can do whatever they want to do its thier business not anyone else's .
So that you are NEVER confused at anytime within the conduction of the experiment.
If they do, others can verify what they report.
It helps with the flow of an experiment and how you correctly do any experiment.
this is important to be her formula is correct.
Good science is reproducible, meaning that other scientists should be able to conduct the same analysis and get similar results. If scientists try the experiments and get different results, then it often means that the original publishers did something wrong.
Good science is reproducible, meaning that other scientists should be able to conduct the same analysis and get similar results. If scientists try the experiments and get different results, then it often means that the original publishers did something wrong.
It is important for scientists to communicate so that they do not repeat the same experiment over and over. If scientists communicate they can learn what works or does not work and move forward with discoveries.
Observation helps scientists gather an collect data, which without, their experiment(s) could not exist
It is very important for scientists to publish important details because other scientists can reach to a conclusion of their experiment and they can give their opinion of how to improve it and also how to notify other people about the experiment so others are aware of it.
so others can repeat it and see if you did it right