Fires do not have cells, or organization. Homeostasis, would also be necessary for living things, which would be maintaining internal functions, like how we would keep our temperature inside at a certain level where it might be rapidly getting colder or warmer around us. Fire does grow and use energy, in a way, but it would need all of the characteristics of a living thing, not just two.
Fire is not a living organism because it has no cells. living things need to: * Need air * Need energy * Produce Waste Products * be able to move by themselves * Respond to changes in the environment * Grow as it ages * Have cells * Reproduce there is some of these things that fire does not have or cant do. Fire is not a living organism because it has no cells. living things need to: * Need air * Need energy * Produce Waste Products * be able to move by themselves * Respond to changes in the environment * Grow as it ages * Have cells * Reproduce there is some of these things that fire does not have or cant do.
because it dosent have mrs gren
M= movement eg. plants tern there leves toward the sun light
R= reproduction eg. humans have kids.
S= sencitiverty (to be awere of the envoroment around you and be able to respond)
G= growth eg. some kids have growth sperts.
R=resparation
E= energy
N= nutrition
Fire is not a living thing because it doesn't have the ability to move, react, reproduce, etc.
1. it grows and reproduces under the right conditions
2. it metabolizes nutrients (burns things)
Fire is simply a end result of combustion. Fire isn't considered alive since its an inorganic compound, like water.
fire is not a living thing.
Fire isn't alive
No, socks are not a living thing- or they might eat your feet! Neither is fire.
Peanut butter is not a living thing.
all because yeast is a living organism and anything living has to orthenticate withh all of MS GREN otherwise it isnt classified as a living organism
science is study of living thing and non living thing
No, it does not posess any of the characteristics of a living thing.
No, socks are not a living thing- or they might eat your feet! Neither is fire.
no. fire is nonliving because it is not made of cells and is 100% predictable when interacting. It also has no reason or instinct.
Because it's an inanimate object, a mechanical construct.
fire is a nonliving thing because it does not show all the characteristics of a living thing....
It doesn't get anything as it isnt a living thing
it can burn and kill animals and their habitats.
Non living
A Candle is not a living thing because it does not have the 7 characteristics of living things which are: movemeny, reproduce, grow, excreate, or exchanging gases. it does have one charteristic of a living thing which is respond. it responds to fire because the fire is something called the stimulus which forces the wax on the candle to melt
Fire is not a living thing because it does not have all of the seven characteristics. Nothing (so far) has proven that fire is made up of cells making it not living. Hope i helped and that you believe me :)
Fire. It doesn't have any cells, but it can grow. : )
no there isnt
It's fire because it's the basic thing for living.