A fossil is not a mineral.
No, fossils are not minerals. ^.^
It would necessarily be sedimentary rock, formed in a saltwater or freshwater environment, depending on the type of clam.
Clams.
I guess a very long time, a 405 year old clam found in Iceland, go to link: http://abcnews.go.com/technology and enter in "oldest clam" or "old clam" in the search field and the article will come up!!
Any group that makes that clam eventually invokes some junk science to bolster its clam. Examples that come to mind are the Nazis, the Klan, and any orthodox strain of so-called political 'nativism'.
Clam
A clam might become a fossil if it gets trapped on a sedimentary rock and remains there for a long..long...time.
A loser
A clam is more likely to fossilize than a jellyfish.
Myalina, a clam fossil.
Clam
because it is organic, and a mineral is inorganic
Which of the following is most likely to become preserved as a fossil? a jellyfisha clam shella leafa worm
Yes
A clam shell is not smooth because being smooth would decrease friction between a clam and the surface it lives on. With low friction, a clam would go places it would not want to go.
if you added water to clam chowder it would taste really watery
It would really depend on the species and the size of the clam. There may not be any data on this actually.
no