Tidewater plantations were large estates along coastal waterways in the Southern colonies, focused on cash crops and operated by enslaved labor. The back-country was the region beyond these plantations, characterized by smaller farms, subsistence agriculture, and a more diverse population including poorer settlers, small landowners, and indigenous peoples.
Backcountry has a wide array of the best gear on the planet for serious, passionate outdoor enthusiasts. They have the highest quality gear for backpacking, camping, trail running, snowboarding, rock climbing, kayaking, mountaineering & more. cutt.ly/0jm7CNW
Tidewater planters were wealthy, slave-owning farmers who cultivated cash crops like tobacco and rice on large plantations near coastal areas, while backcountry farmers were typically poorer, subsistence farmers who lived inland and grew crops for their own consumption. Tidewater planters had closer economic ties to England and were more influenced by British culture, while backcountry farmers tended to be more self-sufficient and resistant to outside influences. Socially, tidewater planters were part of the Southern aristocracy, while backcountry farmers were more egalitarian and independent.
Tidewater planters were wealthy, relied on enslaved labor, and cultivated cash crops like tobacco and rice in the coastal regions. Backcountry farmers were more self-sufficient, lived in the inland areas, and grew crops for subsistence rather than for trade. They often had smaller farms and a more independent lifestyle compared to the planters.
Tidewater regions are coastal areas with flat, fertile land suitable for agriculture, while Piedmont regions are inland areas with rolling hills and rocky terrain. Tidewater regions are typically more developed and have easier access to waterways for trade, while Piedmont regions often have more industrial and mining activity.
The Fall Line. http://www.answers.com/topic/fall-line
the backcountry was more democratic
Planters were well to do people and farmers were poor class
Backcountry has a wide array of the best gear on the planet for serious, passionate outdoor enthusiasts. They have the highest quality gear for backpacking, camping, trail running, snowboarding, rock climbing, kayaking, mountaineering & more. cutt.ly/0jm7CNW
Tidewater planters were wealthy, slave-owning farmers who cultivated cash crops like tobacco and rice on large plantations near coastal areas, while backcountry farmers were typically poorer, subsistence farmers who lived inland and grew crops for their own consumption. Tidewater planters had closer economic ties to England and were more influenced by British culture, while backcountry farmers tended to be more self-sufficient and resistant to outside influences. Socially, tidewater planters were part of the Southern aristocracy, while backcountry farmers were more egalitarian and independent.
Tidewater: Backcountry: *Weathy *Poor *Well respected *Never respected *Low flat ground *Very Mountainous, (hills & stuff) *Farmed things that needed water (tomatoes etc) *Grew wheat etc.
Tidewater planters were wealthy, relied on enslaved labor, and cultivated cash crops like tobacco and rice in the coastal regions. Backcountry farmers were more self-sufficient, lived in the inland areas, and grew crops for subsistence rather than for trade. They often had smaller farms and a more independent lifestyle compared to the planters.
(Most) Southern cities don't enslave black people to pick cotton while on plantations they do.
The main difference between plantations and subsistence farming is the reason for the farming. Subsistence farming is for one's personal diet needs while plantations are mostly for commercial growing.
The geographical dividing line between the Tidewater and the Piedmont in Virginia is the Fall Line
i can not figer a answer for this
Many slaves adopted Christianity
tidewater