It depends, of course, on how far the sea level rises, but let's say that most coastal cities in developed countries would be severely affected (New York; Portsmouth, UK; London; Hamburg and hundreds of others), so that's hundreds of millions for a start. Then there's all those small island nations such as the Maldives that would totally disappear with only a few metres rise.
To pump water out of low lying areas that would be flooded otherwise.
Used to pump water out of low lying areas that would be flooded.
It would have flooded just like today. The people learned to deal with it.
The sea-level would rise and low-lying areas of anywhere in the UK, not just the Wirral, would be covered by the sea, or flooded at high tide. A lot of the Wirral is actually hilly, and would be well above the higher sea-level.
Singapore would get flooded utterly and nearly the entire island would be submerged underwater, along with large loss of life.
Rising sea-levels would submerge the coastal areas. There will be shortage of land for the people. It will damage the coral reefs which ae the 'rainforests of the ocean'.
Not as many people probably probably would have lived near the Nile then.
Not as many people probably probably would have lived near the Nile then.
Best place to find it would probably be in the Flooded Forest in one of the underwater areas. Just search the plants down there and you'll be sure to find some.
It left a rich black silt and that was good for growing crop's .the river had a big flood the people would have a lot of food . If the river had not had flooded as well the people would have starve.
To the north and northwest, where the Chihuahuan and Sonoran deserts are located.
Oxygen levels will decrease and species of animals will gradually disappear.