The North wanted to fight a war of attrition which basically means they would just use their greater population to do as much damage as possible to the South. The South had a smaller population and therefore would have found it quite difficult to fight a war of attrition.
Annual attrition is the actual attrition rate for a year or a period of years. Annualized attrition would be an extrapolation based on the portion of a year (for example, take the actual attrition for 6 months and double it to arrive at an annualized attrition rate).
how infertility and sterility affect the growth of population
The opposite of natural attrition would be artificial or forced attrition, where employees are intentionally let go rather than leaving naturally.
it would decrease population
It should improve the overall project.
Not only would many species of plants and animals suffer severe population declines, but the overall production of oxygen on the planet would be reduced, which could affect the global climate.
Yes
Considering selection, attrition, and history is important because they can impact the validity and generalizability of research findings. Selection bias can affect the representativeness of the sample, attrition can lead to missing data and potential bias, and history can confound the results by external events occurring during the study period. By addressing these factors, researchers can improve the rigor and reliability of their findings.
An attrition rate is how many employees left a company in a period of time. To calculate the attrition rate of an organization, you would divide the average number who left by the average number that remained.
Population shifts would not affect the Senate, but it would affect the House of Representatives, because certain districts or states would be given more Representatives to accurately represent the population of that area.
Generally, because they represent a specific segment of the overall population. Not everyone is handicapped, so an interest group representing them would be a "special" interest group because bills/policies affecting them would not affect the general population, per se.