A proposition of calls for one action or another or argues against one action or another
🔄 Click to see definition
Definition1/16
policy
🔄 Click to see term
Term1/16
How does justice black support the dissenting opinion
🔄 Click to see definition
Definition1/16
by referring to the Waugh v Mississippi university case about protests in fraternities
🔄 Click to see term
Term1/16
Why do justices use precedents in majority opinions and dissents
🔄 Click to see definition
Definition1/16
To show that other cases with similar circumstances came to a
similar decision
🔄 Click to see term
Term1/16
How does Fortas defend the majority decision that free speech in school is constitutionally protected
🔄 Click to see definition
Definition1/16
by arguing that First Amendment rights apply to both teachers and students. -apex
🔄 Click to see term
Term1/16
How are precedents used in majority opinions and dissents
🔄 Click to see definition
Definition1/16
to support an argument by showing that because other courts have
made similar decisions, the decision in the current case must be
logical
🔄 Click to see term
Term1/16
How do judicial reviews in the majority opinion differ from those in the dissent
🔄 Click to see definition
Definition1/16
The majority opinion uses lower courts' decisions on the same
case as evidence.
🔄 Click to see term
Term1/16
What document did justice black criticize as part of his argument in the dissent
🔄 Click to see definition
Definition1/16
the majority opinion. -apex
🔄 Click to see term
Term1/16
What part of supreme court decision comes at the very beginning
🔄 Click to see definition
Definition1/16
Summary
🔄 Click to see term
Term1/16
Which two amendments in the constitution do both justice fortas and justice black refer to
🔄 Click to see definition
Definition1/16
The First and Fourteenth Amendments.
🔄 Click to see term
Term1/16
Which excerpt from tinker v.des moines shows how precedent helps support an argument
🔄 Click to see definition
Definition1/16
"Other cases cited by the Court do not, as implied, follow the McReynolds reasonableness doctrine. West Virginia v. Barnette, 319 U.S. 624, clearly rejecting the ' reasonableness test, held that the Fourteenth Amendment made the First applicable to the states."
this is the full answer the other guy was just lazy and now since I wrote this I know why
🔄 Click to see term
Term1/16
What is written in the Preamble to the Constitution
🔄 Click to see definition
Definition1/16
An explanation that the Constitution's purpose is to prevent abuse in government(apex)
🔄 Click to see term
Term1/16
In the dissent what do justices often point out when making their arguments
🔄 Click to see definition
Definition1/16
Flaws in the majority opinion
🔄 Click to see term
Term1/16
Which of these is a compromise of two proposals for representation that were presented to the Constitutional Convention
🔄 Click to see definition
Definition1/16
The Connecticut Compromise
-Apex
🔄 Click to see term
Term1/16
In terms of supreme court language and protocol what is this excerpt an example of
🔄 Click to see definition
Definition1/16
A Judicial Review.
🔄 Click to see term
Term1/16
As a part of their argument in the dissent what document do justices often criticize
🔄 Click to see definition
Definition1/16
The majority opinion
🔄 Click to see term
Term1/16
How does Fortas defend the majority decision that free-speech in school is constitutionally protected
🔄 Click to see definition
Definition1/16
Fortas defend the majority opinion that free speech in school is constitutionally protected by saying that such an expression isn't disruptive to ...
🔄 Click to see term
🥳
Great job!
You studied all the cards in this guide.
Rate this guide:
☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★
Start overPrint
Full screen
Rate this Study Guide:
☆★☆★☆★☆★☆★
Cards in this guide (16)
A proposition of calls for one action or another or argues against one action or another
policy
How does justice black support the dissenting opinion
by referring to the Waugh v Mississippi university case about protests in fraternities
Why do justices use precedents in majority opinions and dissents
To show that other cases with similar circumstances came to a
similar decision
How does Fortas defend the majority decision that free speech in school is constitutionally protected
by arguing that First Amendment rights apply to both teachers and students. -apex
How are precedents used in majority opinions and dissents
to support an argument by showing that because other courts have
made similar decisions, the decision in the current case must be
logical
How do judicial reviews in the majority opinion differ from those in the dissent
The majority opinion uses lower courts' decisions on the same
case as evidence.
What document did justice black criticize as part of his argument in the dissent
the majority opinion. -apex
What part of supreme court decision comes at the very beginning
Summary
Which two amendments in the constitution do both justice fortas and justice black refer to
The First and Fourteenth Amendments.
Which excerpt from tinker v.des moines shows how precedent helps support an argument
"Other cases cited by the Court do not, as implied, follow the McReynolds reasonableness doctrine. West Virginia v. Barnette, 319 U.S. 624, clearly rejecting the ' reasonableness test, held that the Fourteenth Amendment made the First applicable to the states."
this is the full answer the other guy was just lazy and now since I wrote this I know why
What is written in the Preamble to the Constitution
An explanation that the Constitution's purpose is to prevent abuse in government(apex)
In the dissent what do justices often point out when making their arguments
Flaws in the majority opinion
Which of these is a compromise of two proposals for representation that were presented to the Constitutional Convention
The Connecticut Compromise
-Apex
In terms of supreme court language and protocol what is this excerpt an example of
A Judicial Review.
As a part of their argument in the dissent what document do justices often criticize
The majority opinion
How does Fortas defend the majority decision that free-speech in school is constitutionally protected
Fortas defend the majority opinion that free speech in school is constitutionally protected by saying that such an expression isn't disruptive to ...