preamble
Theft from plantations
by referring to the Waugh v Mississippi university case about protests in fraternities
To show that other cases with similar circumstances came to a similar decision
to support an argument by showing that because other courts have made similar decisions, the decision in the current case must be logical
The majority opinion uses lower courts' decisions on the same case as evidence.
Summary
"Other cases cited by the Court do not, as implied, follow the McReynolds reasonableness doctrine. West Virginia v. Barnette, 319 U.S. 624, clearly rejecting the ' reasonableness test, held that the Fourteenth Amendment made the First applicable to the states."
this is the full answer the other guy was just lazy and now since I wrote this I know why
what are the goals of the text, and what elements help achieve those goals? -apex
A Judicial Review.
The majority opinion
Dissent
Flaws in the majority opinion