It's better to be loved 'cuz people will like you.
Niccolò Machiavelli, an Italian philosopher and writer, famously argued in his work "The Prince" that it is better for a ruler to be feared than loved in order to maintain power and control. Machiavelli believed that fear was a more effective tool for ensuring obedience and loyalty from subjects.
no it's not!....being lovedd is way more important than being feared. yeah fear =respect but no love= being lonely....everyone needs love
It simply means it's better to be feared than loved. Some like to be feared more because when someone fears a person they usually are to scared of them to fight back. But it's more of an opinion because some people would rather be loved
Niccolò Machiavelli, an Italian political philosopher and writer, famously wrote this in his book "The Prince," where he discussed the qualities of an effective ruler. He argued that fear can be a more reliable tool for control and stability than love, as fear of punishment can deter disobedience.
Niccolò Machiavelli, an Italian diplomat, philosopher, and writer, wrote in "The Prince" that it is safer for a ruler to be feared than loved if they cannot be both. He argued that fear is a more reliable means of maintaining power and control.
Machiavelli latently presents idea that the power of the leader depends more on the qualities of the man than on the will of god. That´s the matter. Loved and feared qualities need theirs limits the same way as anything else in social relations.
I think Hammurabi was more effective as a ruler because he mademore harsh rules and punishments than just being a military leaderinstructing everyone.
As a ruler because he became most known for his set of laws, which was what he did as a ruler . (: Say thankks, You should appreciate me for answering your questions/ homework ! Jussayinng ,
Machiavelli believed that a ruler should prioritize power and stability over morality and should be willing to use any means necessary to maintain control. He argued that a ruler should be feared rather than loved by the people, as fear is a more reliable motivator. Additionally, Machiavelli emphasized the importance of being adaptable and pragmatic in making decisions to protect and strengthen one's rule.
What he meant is that, after conquering new territory, you can expect resistance to your rule, unless the locals love you enough not to want to rebel, or are so weak that they do not have the means. What he said is that it would be best to be both loved and feared, but since that is impossible, it is safer if people cannot challenge your rule than if they can, but don't want to.
he loved her. that's for sure. fortunately she loved Edward more and he loved ness more.
"Not that I loved Caesar less, but that I loved Rome more."