Machiavelli latently presents idea that the power of the leader depends more on the qualities of the man than on the will of god. That´s the matter. Loved and feared qualities need theirs limits the same way as anything else in social relations.
Machiavelli advised kings to prioritize their own self-preservation and the stability of their rule above all else. He suggested that rulers should be both feared and loved, but if they had to choose, it is better to be feared. Machiavelli believed that successful rulers should be flexible in their methods and willing to act immorally if it served the interests of the state.
The main theme in Machiavelli's "The Prince" is the idea that a ruler should prioritize maintaining power and stability over being loved or moral. Machiavelli emphasizes the importance of political realism, deceit, and manipulation in achieving and preserving political authority.
Leaders should be concerned with power.
Machiavelli believed that rulers should prioritize maintaining power and stability over being loved by their subjects. He emphasized the use of manipulation, force, and cunning to achieve political goals, advocating for leaders to act in their own self-interest to maintain control and authority. Machiavelli's ideas were outlined in his famous work, "The Prince."
No, it is not selfish to want to be loved. It is a natural human desire to seek love and connection with others.
Machiavelli argues that it is better for a prince to be both loved and feared, but if he cannot be both, it is safer to be feared. He believes that fear can ensure obedience and control, while love can be fickle and easily lost. It is possible for a prince to be both loved and feared, but striking the right balance can be challenging.
According to Machiavelli, he writes, "The answer of course, that it would be best to be both loved and feared." He wants the best of both!
Niccolò Machiavelli, an Italian philosopher and writer, famously argued in his work "The Prince" that it is better for a ruler to be feared than loved in order to maintain power and control. Machiavelli believed that fear was a more effective tool for ensuring obedience and loyalty from subjects.
He believed this because if the people of the town/city loved him, they may get comfortable with him and not do the work they are assighned to
Machiacelli's The Prince is best known for describing whether it is better for a ruler to be feared or loved (Machiavelli chooses feared). Overall, though, the book is a guide on how to/how not to rule over a country, and is an early form of political philosophy.
It is better to be feared than loved, if you cannot be both. ... Niccolo Machiavelli
No, Machiavelli believed that a ruler should prioritize their own power and stability over the happiness of the people. He argued that it is better for a prince to be feared than loved, as fear ensures obedience and stability in a ruler's domain.
Niccolò Machiavelli, an Italian diplomat, philosopher, and writer, wrote in "The Prince" that it is safer for a ruler to be feared than loved if they cannot be both. He argued that fear is a more reliable means of maintaining power and control.
Machiavelli believed that a ruler must be both feared and loved, but if they cannot be both, it is better to be feared than loved. He also emphasized the importance of being cunning, adaptable, and willing to act ruthlessly when necessary to maintain power.
Niccolo Machiavelli
no it's not!....being lovedd is way more important than being feared. yeah fear =respect but no love= being lonely....everyone needs love
What he meant is that, after conquering new territory, you can expect resistance to your rule, unless the locals love you enough not to want to rebel, or are so weak that they do not have the means. What he said is that it would be best to be both loved and feared, but since that is impossible, it is safer if people cannot challenge your rule than if they can, but don't want to.