Posterior hip replacement is easier to perform (the majority of cases use this approach), however some studies indicate that it has a slightly higher risk off dislocation (but not significantly so).
Anterior approach is more technical (and requires more training), and may require special operating tables (which have been linked to complications such as broken ankles), however the recovery time is shorter (by a few days), and has a slightly lower risk of dislocation than the posterior approach.
Unless the surgeon is a regular user of the anterior approach (done 20+), I would go for the posterior approach.
what were the pros and cons for the nulification
pros an cons of the Oregon trail
pros are + and cons are-
pros: goodness cons: badness
PROS CONS ----------------------------------------------------- Pros: Entertaining Cons: Mental conditions can be caused, Adicition, Expensive.
Cons? What Cons?
what are the pros and cons of being an architect
Usually there are no pros or cons.
pros and cons about mercantilist and physiocrats
What are the pros and cons of transformational leadership?
pros none cons homework
pros= nothing cons=everything