Two reasons why data might not support a hypothesis are that the experiment had a flaw or was not repeated enough times. This happens a lot.
Two reasons why data might not support a hypothesis are that the experiment had a flaw or was not repeated enough times. This happens a lot.
Two reasons why data might not support a hypothesis are that the experiment had a flaw or was not repeated enough times. This happens a lot.
i like 69 in the but
An experiment might not support a hypothesis even if the hypothesis is correct because if the conclusion
A better explanation might exist.
A better explanation might exist.
A better explanation might exist.
A better explanation might exist.
you need to ask ----> Does my conclusion support my hypothesis?
A hypothesis is a proposed explanation for a phenomenon, while a prediction is a statement about an expected outcome based on the hypothesis. The hypothesis guides the prediction by suggesting what might happen in a given situation. Predictions are then tested to determine if they support or refute the hypothesis.
There are two reasons on why people might support trial by jury. The jury is needed for trials because if if the jury is not convinced with the case then there is no more case if they are convinced then it is a win win case.
It ultimately depends on what your theory is. Sometimes the fact that your data doesn't support your hypothesis means that the theory from which the hypothesis was derived was altogether wrong and is therefore discarded. Other times it might just mean a simple modification of the original theory, to accommodate the new-found evidence.The most important thing to remember is that your data will not always support your hypothesis, and in the event that such happens, you end learning a whole lot more.A.B.C.D.its A