Mutation would not be harmful if the mutation allowed an animal to live longer. This may be the case if an animal that is not normally albino is born albino in a place that gets a lot of snow.
a bad mutation would be if your DNA coded for you not to be able to digest fats. you would starve to death.
A mutation in a DNA nucleotide sequence would be more harmful than a mutation in a mRNA nucleotide sequence because it could cause the synthesis of multiple nonfunctional proteins in comparison to a mutation in a mRNA nucleotide sequence that would be less harmful because it would result in a few nonfunctional proteins.
harmful mutation
it can be, it depends on whether the mutation is useful
yes some....
a mutation is sometimes a form of adaptation, but if something changes in the DNA of the species and could possibly be harmful to it, that is a harmful mutation.Examples:-born without a part of the brain-cancer is a form of a harmful mutation-hypoglycemia
A deleterious mutation has a negative effect on the phenotype, and thus decreases the fitness of the organism. (A harmful mutation)
its not
mutation
No. Although there is a chance of a beneficial mutation, the chance of it occurring is almost astronomical. Most mutations are harmful to humans.
A harmful mutation is one that can disrupt the normal functioning of a gene, leading to the production of a non-functional or altered protein. This can result in diseases or disorders, such as cancer, cystic fibrosis, or sickle cell anemia. Harmful mutations can also impact an individual's ability to survive and reproduce.
If it is harmful it will not survive long