To accurately answer your question, I would need the specific conclusions you are referring to regarding schizophrenia. However, generally speaking, conclusions that suggest schizophrenia is solely caused by a single genetic factor or that it is entirely a result of environmental influences are often not supported by current research. Modern studies typically indicate that schizophrenia arises from a complex interplay of genetic, neurobiological, and environmental factors.
There is insufficient information in the question to answer it. You did not provide the list of "the following conclusions". Please restate the question.Schizophrenics produce excessive amounts of the neurotransmitter serotonin.
I'm happy to help, but it seems like you haven't provided the studies or conclusions for me to evaluate. If you can provide more information, I can assist in drawing conclusions based on that.
Countries economies became more interconnected following World War I APEX
The two hit hypothesis of schizophrenia postulates that there are two different yet necessary malfunctions in the brain that cause schizophrenia. The first happens while a baby is still inside the womb. This could be from faulty genetics, bad brain cells, lack of oxygen during birth or even drugs or infections the mother might have in her body. The second hit happens later in life due to the brain changing as it grows, a major life stressor such as a young adult going to college or taking on a job after high school. The brain must be faulty and unable to process stress correctly (1st hit) so that when life stress happens (2nd) hit schizophrenia symptoms begin to come out.
Pan-Africanism failed to achieve its most important objectives.
A scientific theory is supported by evidence. Without evidence, it is only a hypothesis.
You should ask yourself if the data supported your hypothesis.
Conclusions that are not logically supported do not necessarily invalidate the entire study, but they do call into question the credibility and reliability of the findings. Researchers should ensure that their conclusions are based on sound logical reasoning and evidence to maintain the validity of their study.
Relative
well to be honestly fair from the deepest part of me heart, i have no clue
My conclusions are based on extensive research and analysis of relevant data, studies, and expert opinions. I utilize a combination of current information and established facts to arrive at well-informed and supported conclusions.
There is no scientific research that supports this idea.