A Human being has two kidneys and can donate one and continue to live. However the quality of life is lowered after the donation.
always alive person
We would not be alive.
There aren't really any advantages over a kidney transplant, as dialysis is used to keep patients alive while they wait for a transplant. Patients are always on the waiting list for a transplant, which shows that there isn't really any benefit.
It depends on the quality of the kidney in question, no alot of people want dead kidneys so I'd say Alive.
Being alive is certainly better than the alternative in the vast majority of cases. However, a pacemaker has nothing to do with the function of the kidneys.
The law doesn't determine this, a doctor does. However a judge can certify a person deceased after 7 years if there is adequate legal evidence that the person is no longer alive.
unless they are dead
You have to be either dead or alive. However, if you are in a coma, you are alive but seem dead because you can't do anything.
YES, the little girl with kidney cancer, or something like that. She is still alive.
Dead since there will always be more people that are dead than alive. If a person dies, he has lived, but is dead. Hence, always dead. If a person is living, he is only living for the time being. So really, it's philosophical question.
He died of a kidney disorder on April 9, 2001.
when Liam was younger he had to have 32 injections a day to stay alive because he was born with only one kidney therefor if he drinks he has to be careful because of his one kidney