Obedience and conformity are fascinating to psychologists because they reveal how social influences shape behavior and decision-making. These concepts help researchers understand the dynamics of authority, group pressure, and individual morality, illuminating why people often act against their own beliefs or values. Studying obedience and conformity can also provide insights into social cohesion, cultural norms, and the mechanisms behind compliance, essential for addressing issues like prejudice and ethical behavior in society.
Psychologist has more opportunities although the latter seems more interesting.
The psychologist who conducted the research on group conformity using cards with lines of varying lengths and stooges was Solomon Asch. His well-known experiment showed the power of social pressure in influencing individuals to conform with incorrect group responses.
Solomon Asch.
conformity
A psychologist concerned with how people are influenced by their surroundings is often a social psychologist. Social psychologists study the impact of social contexts, environments, and group dynamics on individual behavior and attitudes. They explore how factors such as culture, social norms, and social interactions shape perceptions and actions. Their research helps to understand phenomena such as conformity, persuasion, and group behavior.
Declaration of Conformity was created in 1996.
Corrosion of Conformity was created in 1982.
Psychologist is a noun.
The word conformity is most commonly used in the expression in conformity with (as in in conformity with regulations). It means as required by ... and should not be confused with conformism, which means doing, saying or being the same as everyone else.to conform?
conformity
Bernard P. Cohen has written: 'Conflict and conformity' -- subject(s): Conformity, Mathematical models 'Conflict, conformity, and social status' -- subject(s): Conformity, Mathematical models
The experiment on conformity was conducted by psychologist Solomon Asch in the 1950s. In his study, participants were asked to judge the lengths of lines while being influenced by a group of confederates who intentionally provided incorrect answers. Asch's findings revealed that individuals often conformed to the group's wrong judgments, highlighting the power of social pressure on individual decision-making.