planned parenthood sued the Pennsylvania law.
No one. It was Planned Parenthood who sued the Pennsylvania law and Pennsylvania was represented by Robert P. Casey, Governor of Pennsylvania. The case was about upholding the right for abortion.
planned parenthood won the caseThat states had some rights in restricting abortions
Nothing surprises me.
A woman was no longer required by law to tell her partner about her decision to have an abortion.
In Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey (1992), the legal question before the court centered on the constitutionality of several Pennsylvania state regulations regarding abortion. Specifically, the case challenged provisions requiring informed consent, a 24-hour waiting period, and parental consent for minors, among others. The Supreme Court had to determine whether these regulations imposed an undue burden on a woman's right to choose an abortion, as established in Roe v. Wade. Ultimately, the Court reaffirmed the right to abortion while allowing some state regulations.
Casey's Court refers to a legal principle derived from the U.S. Supreme Court case Planned Parenthood v. Casey (1992), which upheld the constitutional right to an abortion while allowing states to impose certain restrictions. The ruling emphasized that states could regulate abortions as long as those regulations did not place an "undue burden" on a woman's right to choose. This decision reaffirmed the core principles established in Roe v. Wade while permitting some state-level regulations.
Some similar cases to Roe v. Wade that have had a significant impact on reproductive rights in the United States include Planned Parenthood v. Casey, Whole Woman's Health v. Hellerstedt, and June Medical Services v. Russo. These cases have addressed issues such as abortion restrictions, access to reproductive healthcare, and the constitutional right to privacy.
Some cases similar to Roe v. Wade that have had a significant impact on reproductive rights in the United States include Planned Parenthood v. Casey, which reaffirmed the central holding of Roe v. Wade, and Whole Woman's Health v. Hellerstedt, which struck down restrictive abortion laws in Texas. These cases have shaped the legal landscape surrounding reproductive rights in the country.
The Casey case, formally known as Planned Parenthood v. Casey (1992), modified Roe v. Wade by reaffirming the constitutional right to have an abortion while allowing states to impose certain regulations. The Supreme Court upheld the central holding of Roe but introduced the "undue burden" standard, stating that states could not place significant obstacles in the path of women seeking abortions before fetal viability. This allowed for more state-level restrictions, such as waiting periods and informed consent laws, as long as they did not create an undue burden on a woman's right to choose.
He has said that he will get rid of federal funding for planned parenthood. He has said he would overturn Roe v. Wade which is the basis of women's right to choose to have an abortion until the fetus is viable. So, NO, Romney is NOT pro-choice.
Clinton. Clinton v. Jones.
Less Than Perfect - 2002 Casey V- Kronsky 3-21 was released on: USA: 8 April 2005 Finland: 4 March 2007