The Taliban was a Fundamentalist Islamic Regime.As for their political views, below are two opinions on what the Taliban represent. Most Westerners and Muslims stand in opposition to the Taliban, but there is certainly a large minority of Muslims who endorse the vision of the Taliban.Pro-Taliban AnswerTaliban believe in following Islamic Law which is the best way of living and gives equal opportunities to both Muslims and Non-Muslims.Islamic laws, mostly interpreted negatively, are unparalleled by any other law ever formulated. Generally considered as inhumane punishments only, Islamic Laws, when implemented in the true sense, are only harsh for the wrongdoers. History has shown that with the proper implementation of Islamic Laws, crimes have substantially decreased.Yes, there are a few people who are involved in thefts, ransom, killings and many other dreadful crimes and call themselves Taliban, however, they are not at all Talibans, rather they are agents hired by Indians, Israel, America, Russia and other anti Islamic Christian nations. They have been caught and have admitted of being paid by the above mentioned criminals who call themselves great democratic countries. Other proof of them being non-Muslims is that they are uncircumcised. For pictures of these people, you can contact me.So, decide for yourselves, what Taliban believe in.Anti-Taliban AnswersAnswer 1Utter nonsense. The Taliban are followers of the Wahhabi form of Sunni Islam. To say that the Taliban were tolerant of anyone is pure fiction. The Taliban had no tolerance for anyone other than fellow Wahhabi Muslims to include other Muslims. They not only endorsed but assisted Osama Bin Laden in his war against the west and anyone not Wahhabi. Thousands of innocent Afghan men, women and children were slaughtered without cause, trial or defense by these butchers. Religion of peace is a nice slogan but the facts bear out differently. The Taliban banned just about everything in life that could bring happiness and joy including: anything made from human hair, satellite dishes, cinematography, any musical equipment, pool tables, chess, masks, alcohol, videotapes, computers, VCRs, television, any sexual products, wine, lobster, nail polish, firecrackers, statues, sewing catalogs, pictures, Christmas cards and more.Answer 2Further to the unqualified statements in the Pro-Taliban answer, some of the punishments imposed by the Taliban include cutting off limbs, decapitation and stoning for relatively minor offenses, forms of torture to reform behavior, and numerous other actions in contravention to International Law and Human Rights. Most Westerners believe that these actions are unjust, even if the person is 100% guilty of the crime, since there is an inherent dignity in being human which is not compromised by guilt. As to the "proof" that all Taliban caught of vicious crimes against the Afghan and Pakistani citizenry, their property, and their livelihoods are not "real Taliban" but imposters, there is no grounding to this assertion. Even if such individuals have disavowed their connection to the Taliban, this could be under duress (since many are tortured to achieve this confession) or their desire not to "slander" the Taliban. The Taliban videoed many of their Human Rights abuses specifically because they were proud of their depravity.This is not to say that Shari'a Law if implemented properly could not be the highest quality of law, securing human and property rights. The problem is that nobody seems to know what this "proper" implementation looks like or if they believe that they do, they are immediately contested by individuals with a more liberal or conservative view. Issues of contention are not trivial banalities, such as freedom of speech, equality vs. apartheid, freedom of association, taxing by wealth or taxing by ethnicity/religion, etc.
Clergymen often described Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.'s actions as both courageous and controversial. Some praised his commitment to nonviolent protest and his moral leadership in the civil rights movement, viewing him as a prophetic figure advocating for justice and equality. However, others criticized him for his methods and perceived radicalism, arguing that his actions were too disruptive. Overall, King was seen as a pivotal figure in challenging systemic racism and promoting social change.
No, Egypt was a very advanced civilization. They had technologies that we still have not totally figured out today, especially in the field of architecture.
Union General William T. Sherman was unfairly criticized when he captured Atlanta, Georgia. This was because he ordered the immediate evacuation of all civilians form the city. Sherman's response was in line with the humane side of himself. As he was sure that Confederate General John B. Hood would attack Sherman's forces in Atlanta, he responded that it would be better to not fight a battle in Atlanta and endanger the citizens there. This was a proper decision that he made at the time.
Answer 1it depends on how you look at it.. because the citizens of Afghanistan were becoming like the people of the west. the taliban stepped in to bring back Islam to the country.Answer 2There is no way the Taliban can be considered "good". They were women haters. Girls were not allows to go to school. /women had to covered in black from head to toe, including covering their faces. Women could not leave the house without a male relative. Women could not work, even if there was no male member of the household to provide for them. Men had to wear their hair and beard to precise orders. Music and dancing was not allowed. No opposition was allowed. No freedom of speec,h press, assembly, etc. The Taliban were ruthless. Public hangings and stonings were common.Men who join the Taliban are the worst of sadistic psychopaths. They enjoy violence, murder, and keep the population terrified. There is no Muslim country that wants the return of the Taliban.
They shouldn't. if your actions are criticized only you can find out why.
INternationally binding actions to curb the hot house effect.
The Taliban fighters primarily adhere to Sunni Islam, specifically following a strict interpretation of the Hanafi school of thought. Their beliefs are heavily influenced by a fundamentalist interpretation of Islamic teachings, which they use to justify their actions and governance. The Taliban also incorporates cultural and tribal practices into their ideology, which can sometimes intersect with their religious beliefs.
you will be internationally credit card and loan banned , after two year you will be arrested the all process take two year to let actions by Dubai start internationally
No, it is not legal for any group, including the Taliban, to take people from their homes and execute them in the street. Such actions constitute violations of human rights and international law, including principles against extrajudicial killings and the right to life. While the Taliban may operate under their own laws or interpretations of Islamic law, these actions are widely condemned by the international community.
Chile's jailing newspaper reporters who criticized the government. MommaGee
Beowulf did not tell Unferth a specific lie. He rather criticized Unferth's own past actions and confronted him about his failures in battling Grendel, challenging his bravery and heroism.
Yes but when? President Obama clearly views him as a hero - he traded 5 Taliban leaders to get him back. Will President Obama have the pleasure of presenting this to him? Time will tell.
In "Pride and Prejudice," the term "unassailed" means not being attacked or criticized. It describes a state of being untouched or unharmed by negative comments or actions.
Argentina had influence on the rest of the world in WWII. They sent thousands of cattle to Britain free of charge. They were criticized for their actions since people in their own country were suffering from malnutrition.
Another word for being judged is "assessed." It can also be referred to as "evaluated," which implies a careful consideration of someone's actions or character. Other synonyms include "criticized" or "appraised," depending on the context.
Being censured means being formally reprimanded or officially criticized for one's actions. It is a public expression of disapproval that often comes from a governing body, organization, or institution. Censure can have various consequences, such as a loss of privileges or reputation.