That would be Kansas and Nebraska. These 2 territories would lead to the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854, and would be one of several reasons for the American Civil War.
The Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854, gave each state a provision of "popular sovereignty." This provision stated that, all questions of slavery in the new territories were to be decided by the settlers.
Nebraska, became a free state. However, the Southern Senator's in Washington, did everything they possibly could to make Kansas a slave state.
Soon settlers from both North and South were streaming into Kansas, aided by groups who wanted to influence the decision on slavery. Kansans who opposed slavery formed a political party known as the Free State party. In the elections of 1855, many citizens of the slave state of Missouri, crossed the boarder and voted in Kansas.
Pro-slavery candidates won control of the territorial legislature, and passed many pro-slavery laws.
Violence broke out, particularly in the area close to the Missouri boarder. In 1856, supporters of slavery burned part of the Free State town in Lawrence. John Brown, a man who hated slavery, led a raid on Pottawatomie Creek, and 5 pro-slavery men were killed. More than 50 other persons died in small battles of this period. The violence in Kansas over the slavery issue attracted attention from throughout the United States. Everyone in the country waited anxiously, for the latest reports they would find in their newspapers on "Bleeding Kansas."
Kansas became the 34th state on January 29, 1861, and was admitted as a Free State.
The Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854, made the use of Congressional compromises unnecessary. Voters in territories could vote on the issue of slavery before the territory petitioned for statehood. What remained from the 1850 compromise was the Fugitive Slave Act. Even in 1860, president-elect Lincoln promised to enforce this law as long as it existed.
The Missouri Compromise of 1820 lasted 30 years. The US remained divided on where slavery could exist and thus the Missouri Compromise of 1850 was enacted.
it was designed to stop the unbalance of the union(the US). It alloweed there to be an equal # of slave state=s and free state so that the power remained equal in the nation and in congress.
It was a remarkably effective law that somewhat quietened the debate and kept the peace for thirty years. The Missouri Compromise represented the simple 'line in the sand' - it marked a single parallel as the frontier of slavery, and any territory North of that line would have to join the USA as free soil. Neither side was totally satisfied with the arrangement, but at least both sides were equally dissatisfied! And the situation remained quite balanced, until it was upset by the prospect of California gaining statehood. This territory was simply too vast to be accommodated according to the Compromise, and a new one had to be worked out. The new one (Compromise of 1850) did not hold.
The Philippines, Guam and Puerto Rico.
No, it decided exactly the opposite. Slaves that got into free territories remained the property of the slaveholder and had to be returned to the slaveholder, because the Supreme Court declared the Missouri Compromise unconstitutional.
The Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854, made the use of Congressional compromises unnecessary. Voters in territories could vote on the issue of slavery before the territory petitioned for statehood. What remained from the 1850 compromise was the Fugitive Slave Act. Even in 1860, president-elect Lincoln promised to enforce this law as long as it existed.
The number of U.S. Senators from slave and free states remained even.
Under the Missouri Compromise of 1820 Missouri was admitted as a slave state and Maine as a free state.
The Missouri Compromise of 1820 lasted 30 years. The US remained divided on where slavery could exist and thus the Missouri Compromise of 1850 was enacted.
The slaves remained there without standing any chance of freedom whatsoever. It remained as the most segregated part of the country due to its political stance. As a result, it also remained as the poorest part of the country as well.
The Supreme Court's sentence stated near or less followings: - Dred Scott was a slave and then no US citizen. So he had no right of appeal to the Federal Justice; - his stay in Territories where Missouri Compromise had forbidden the slavery meant but nothing because the Compromise had been void and without effect since its formulation in 1820, as the Congress had no power to legislate on slavery in the Territories; - according to this thesis, the Territories were and remained open to any form of exploitation, with or without the slavery; - The Missouri Compromise had been totally unconstitutional and unconstitutional would be any future Congress's attempt to interfere about the matter of slavery in the western Territories. That led to a huge raise of opposing and violent reactions both in the North and South, which neared the Nation to a conflict between the States.
Speaker of the House of Representatives, Henry Clay, who came from the boarder state of Kentucky, mediated between the North and the South, concerning the territory of Missouri becoming a state. From the Missouri Compromise, that became law in March of 1820: Missouri became a slave state, and Maine would enter as a free state. In addition, the territory that remained from the Louisiana Purchase was divided in two along the line 36 degrees 30 minutes latitude. With the exception of Missouri, slavery was prohibited in states north of that line.
Missouri remained loyal to the North or Union.
Congress orchestrated a two-part compromise, granting Missouri's request but also admitting Maine as a free state. It also passed an amendment that drew an imaginary line across the former Louisiana Territory, establishing a boundary between free and slave regions that remained the law of the land until it was negated by the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854.
The bloodshed in Kansas would have been avoided. The line of the Missouri Compromise would have remained. But that line did not extend into the new territories acquired from Mexico. There would have to have been some other provision for the possible creation of new slave-states in the West. Otherwise, the country would have drifted towards Civil War anyway.
it was designed to stop the unbalance of the union(the US). It alloweed there to be an equal # of slave state=s and free state so that the power remained equal in the nation and in congress.