0
The British benefited much more from the economic system than most Indians did.
British pressure on farmers to switch from food crops to cash crops contributed to famines that killed millions of Indians.
Much of India endured deforestationThe systematic clearing of forests. to make room for cash crops.
The importing of British textiles damaged the Indian textile industry.
The British refused to give Indians key roles in government.
The school system set up by the British served only the elite; roughly 90 percent of Indians did not benefit from the schools.
What else can I help you with?
What were the bad effects of the British empire?
The British took peoples friends and families away from them and took money away from people
Why did Gandhi think that life under British rule was so bad?
Gandhi believed that life under British rule was detrimental to India because it stripped the country of its self-governance, exploited its resources, and undermined its cultural identity. He viewed British colonial policies as oppressive, fostering economic inequality and social injustice. Additionally, he argued that British rule perpetuated a system that favored a small elite while disenfranchising the majority of Indians. This led him to advocate for nonviolent resistance and self-reliance as means to achieve independence and restore dignity to the Indian populace.
What was India's reaction to the treaty of Versailles?
Britain represented the entire British Empire at Versailles.
What nation colonized India?
I'm assuming you mean what NON-native country. The Dutch were there there. The Portugese were there. The British were there, and stayed the longest. Their rule wasn't necessarily bad, but when they left they really screwed it up and millions of people died just because of their religion. Of course, before them the Greeks were there, the Mongols, the Turks, etc etc etc.
Why do you think the British East India Company's monopoly on tea was a bad thing for colonial merchants?
cant afford it
What were the bad effects of the British empire?
The British took peoples friends and families away from them and took money away from people
Was the british empire in India good or bad?
no they were quite mean until Gandhi came!
Why did Gandhi think that life under British rule was so bad?
Gandhi believed that life under British rule was detrimental to India because it stripped the country of its self-governance, exploited its resources, and undermined its cultural identity. He viewed British colonial policies as oppressive, fostering economic inequality and social injustice. Additionally, he argued that British rule perpetuated a system that favored a small elite while disenfranchising the majority of Indians. This led him to advocate for nonviolent resistance and self-reliance as means to achieve independence and restore dignity to the Indian populace.
What was India's reaction to the treaty of Versailles?
Britain represented the entire British Empire at Versailles.
What are bad effects of western culture on India?
Some of the bad effects of western culture are:- 1. Effect on Indian songs and music. 2. LOSS of Indian culture. 3. Influence on dressing style of Indian Youth
What nation colonized India?
I'm assuming you mean what NON-native country. The Dutch were there there. The Portugese were there. The British were there, and stayed the longest. Their rule wasn't necessarily bad, but when they left they really screwed it up and millions of people died just because of their religion. Of course, before them the Greeks were there, the Mongols, the Turks, etc etc etc.
Why do you think the British East India Company's monopoly on tea was a bad thing for colonial merchants?
cant afford it
In the mid-1800 did India become a colony of great Britain?
The British first arrived in India around 1600. They came to trade. The British East India Company was formed to facilitate that trade. The French were also there. At the end of the Seven Years War (1756-1763), the French lost there trading rights in India and the British East India company began to establish greater control, generally through agreements with the Mughal rulers. By the 1840's the British East India Company had control of much of India. In 1857, the Sepoy troops used by the BEIC rebelled against the British. Conditions were bad in India. Following the rebellion, the British government ended the charter of the British East India Company and took over the management of India, making it a colony. Queen Victoria became the Empress of India. It remained a British colony until 1947. This time period is known as the British Raj.
Why was Jahangir's decision to sign a commercial agreement with the British a bad idea?
Mughal emperor Jahangir signed a commercial agreement with British East India Company and allowed them to establish trading posts in Surat and later on in Bombay, Calcutta and even Bengal. The company slowly monopolized trade in India and even expanded militarily. East India Company's forces crushed resistance from local rulers and grew in influence and power and eventually weakened the Mughal rule in sub-continent.
Why was India a goog colony of the british empire?
The British first arrived in India around 1600. They came to start trading monopolies with them. The British East India Company was formed to facilitate that trade. The French were also there. At the end of the Seven Years'War (1756-1763), the French lost their trading rights in India and the British East India Company began to establish greater control, generally through agreements with the Mughal rulers. By the 1840's, the British East India Company had control of much of India. In 1857, the Sepoy troops used by the BEIC rebelled against the British. Conditions were bad in India. Following the rebellion, the British government ended the charter of the British East India Company and took over the management of India, making it a colony, and Queen Victoria became the Empress of India. It remained a British colony until 1947. This time period is known as the British Raj.
What would happen if the colonists had given in to Britain?
We'd most likely still be under British rule. Not that that would a bad thing.
Were the committees of correspondence good or bad?
For the Loyalists and those that sought to maintain British rule in the American colonies, they were very bad. For the Patriots who shared a common goal of determining their own destinies, they were essential. Many of those who were active in the Committees had come to resent the rule of King George and the British Parliament, and they began to espouse American independence.
