Compare and contrast the Compromise of 1850 and the Missouri Compromise of 1820?

Answer 1

Alright, listen up! The Missouri Compromise of 1820 drew a line at 36°30' to determine slave and free states, while the Compromise of 1850 allowed California to enter as a free state and included a stricter Fugitive Slave Law. So basically, one drew a line in the sand, and the other tried to clean up a mess with a stricter law. Got it? Good.

Answer 2

Oh, dude, you're hitting me with the history questions now? Alright, so like, the Missouri Compromise of 1820 was all about drawing a line at 36°30' to decide where slavery could happen, while the Compromise of 1850 was more like a bunch of laws dealing with the territories gained from the Mexican-American War. They both tried to calm down the whole slavery debate, but things were still pretty tense, you know?

Answer 3

The Compromise of 1850 and the Missouri Compromise of 1820 were both attempts to address the issue of slavery in the United States. The Missouri Compromise drew a line across the Louisiana Territory, with slavery permitted below the line and prohibited above it. In contrast, the Compromise of 1850 allowed for the admission of California as a free state and included the Fugitive Slave Act, which required the return of escaped slaves to their owners. Both compromises were temporary solutions that ultimately failed to prevent the outbreak of the Civil War.

Answer 4

Ah, the Compromise of 1850 and the Missouri Compromise of 1820, two important pieces of history. The Missouri Compromise aimed to balance free and slave states, while the Compromise of 1850 addressed issues arising from the Mexican-American War. Both compromises sought to ease tensions between the North and South, showing that even in difficult times, solutions can be found through understanding and cooperation.

Answer 5

The Compromise of 1850 can be compared to the Compromise of 1820 (Missouri Compromise), mainly by comparing how the two compromises were different and alike in how they were able to successfully appease both the North and the South on the issue of slavery. The Compromise of 1850 was designed to prevent the South from seceding, and delaying the Civil War. It was created mostly to deal with the problem on how to annex California into the Union, because the North and the South disputed over whether or not to split California into two different states, the Northern section being slave-free, and the Southern section allowing slavery. The Compromise of 1820 prohibited slavery above the line of 30o60' North, except in Missouri, therefore solving the problem of how to divide the land acquired by the Union in the Mexican War.

Answer 6

An agreement between the North and the South and passed by Congress in 1820 that allowed Missouri to be admitted as the 24th state in 1821. The North's attempt to force emancipation upon Missouri when it applied for admission as a slave state in 1819 rankled white southerners, and they threatened secession during the debates over the conditions under which Missouri should be granted statehood. The debates resulted in a compromise that involved the drawing of a line through the Louisiana Purchase territory prohibiting slavery north of the latitude 36°30′ and allowing it in the south.

Answer 7

The compromise of 1820 is the missouri compromise and it prohibited slavery in unorganized territory of the great plans. The compromise of 1850 amitted california as a free state.