A king chose the highest order of vassals. They were the peers, and they had titles. The peers, who could be dukes, counts or earls, barons, and so forth, chose their own vassals at least part of the time, perhaps their overlords chose for them. In this way, a feudal pyramid was constructed from the highest person in authority to the lowest.
Vassals were required to give allegiance and support to their lords. The lords gave them land in exchange. And this also was operated in the same feudal pyramid.
In theory the king could elevate anyone to any station outside the church, and often inside the church.
A knight would often be a vassal of a more powerful noble, or subsidiary to the noble in another way.A powerful noble could also hold a knighthood himself.
hhhff
Do something VERY valuable to the sitting government
Whether or not a noble was a vassal of the king depended on the rank of the noble and the location. In the middle ages every noble was a vassal except the king. However, not all were vassals of the king. The top nobles or counts were vassals of the king. They had nobles under them. Those nobles had to obey their counts but did not have to obey the king. So a count could and frequently did join a civil war against a king.When William the Conqueror conquered England, he not only made his barons vassals to the king, but he also made the entire population vassals of the king. Thus in England the entire population consisted of the king's vassals. l
The granting of land by a noble to a lesser noble was called subinfeudation.2nd Answer: This is partially correct. Subinfeudation is when a lord grants land to a lesser noble which the first lord already holds as a fief from a greater lord. So if an earl hold 20 manors from a duke or king, and in turn grants ten of them as fiefs to knights so he has his own vassals, this is subinfeudation. The general process of granting land in exchange for military service or other duties or obligations would be in general called vassalage. The lesser lord becomes the vassal of the greater. The vassal swears homage and fealty. The lord transfers control of the land in question and agrees to provide protection for the vassal.It was also possible for a vassal to have more than one lord. A vassal could only swear homage to one person, who was his primary lord, and his first loyalty in the case of a conflict of interest, but it was possible to swear fealty to more than one lord, and hold land from multiple greater lords.
A knight would often be a vassal of a more powerful noble, or subsidiary to the noble in another way.A powerful noble could also hold a knighthood himself.
A noble was the lord ( landlord) of his lands and people but he was a vassal to the king who gave him those lands. The lands could be taken away at any time along with any titles and even his life if the king so choose to do so.
A vassal
A vassal
vassal
He would do anything the noble needed to be done, and fight in his wars.
Vassal
hhhff
First, a noble would hand a bit of land called a fief to one of his most trusted being called a vassals in exchange for protection like a knight. The vassal must swear and oath that he will be loyal to his noble. A noble who gives a fief to a knight is called a lord. This vassal may hand a bit of land to another vassal, who we'll call vassal B and he shall swear an oath and so on. So one can be a lord and vassal.
A vassal is a serf or peon. The opposite of that would be the ruler. You could say the lord or lady. You might also say the one in charge.
No. A vassal works for the lord. The only way they could be the same is the lord is a vassal for a person of higher nobility than he is like a king. A Duke could be the vassal of the king because he has pledged his support to the king. Unlike a vassal working the lords land the Duke could change his alliance to the King changing his support to another.
Do something VERY valuable to the sitting government