"de facto" literally means "about or concerning fact", but in our usage, we take it as "in practice, but not required by law". The concept of "de facto" segregation means that even though there is no law requiring separation or segregation (of race or creed or whatever), the people choose to segregate themselves.
Blacks were treated poorly because of racism, the belief that skin color makes some people superior to others. In fact, segregation both resulted from and perpetuated racism by forcing blacks to live with less access to health care, nutritious food, and education.
Segregation is a bad thing. The WikiAnswers person that wrote before me wrote something not very nice, stating that Whites will always hate blacks. In fact, One of my best friends in black, why does it matter if they're skin is different? What is one day you're friend came in with a permanent black tattoo on her skin, would you hate her?? I don't think so, so stop segregation!!
Possibly when the first Cro Magnon met with Homo Sapiens. It may have been earlier in un-recorded history and perhaps it was much later. It has been around, it is a shamefull part of human socialization, it will exist for a long time, it will never be right or correct or honorable. A few rare societies have avoided segregation and discrimination problems, perhaps another such world will exist in a millineum or two.this is a true fact
King provided leadership for a movement towards equality that invited people (regardless of color) to come together to support a moral cause, civil rights. The fact that his was a "nonviolent" model, was very important especially because of the fact that segregation in the south was "the law". His message inspired those of us living and growing up in the south to do something about our disenfranchisement, and people from all over the nation to help us.
De facto segregation occurs when people are segregated based on factors other than legal requirements, such as socioeconomic status or personal preferences, rather than explicit laws or regulations. This can lead to patterns of residential segregation or exclusion in areas like housing, education, or employment.
the answer is law
De jure segregation is a separation that is enforced by rule of law, such as pre-civil rights laws that mandated that persons of color sit in separate areas or use differing facilities. The landmark Supreme Court ruling, Brown v Board of Education highlighted the importance of the distinction between defacto segregation, which is segregation by personal preference, and de jure segregation.
It's a circumstance because one yes it did happen, but it wasn't right, and two because it had to do with a vast amount of Americans.
"de facto" literally means "about or concerning fact", but in our usage, we take it as "in practice, but not required by law". The concept of "de facto" segregation means that even though there is no law requiring separation or segregation (of race or creed or whatever), the people choose to segregate themselves.
Blacks were treated poorly because of racism, the belief that skin color makes some people superior to others. In fact, segregation both resulted from and perpetuated racism by forcing blacks to live with less access to health care, nutritious food, and education.
De jure means "by law" and de facto means "as a matter of fact." So De jure segregation is segregation required by law (such as a school being segregated because there is a law requiring it), whereas de facto segregation is more just by chance (such as settlement patterns in a city leading to segregated schools).De facto segregation is segregation by fact or circumstance. Very often this is not a conscious choice. A good example is found in neighborhoods, frequently there is a white neighborhood or a black neighborhood, this concentration can lead to schools that are predominately one race. (Xe facto is latin for by fact.)"De facto" means the person who is serving in that position, or as "in fact"; whereas "de jure" means the person who is legally entitled to perform that function, or "by law," and has the right to perform a function or hold an office. It is important to note that hundreds of years ago, women did not have certain rights, and their husbands would perform the functions for them, although there are other latin terms for that.
A child or mentally handicapped person can know a fact but not be responsible for the proper application of that fact. So, yes, knowing and responsibility can be separated.
When segregation is ordered by law, it is called de jure segregation; when created by social or environmental circumstances it is called de facto segregation. De facto means "existing in fact," without being mandated by law.
For the most part, it was not de jure (i.e, a matter of law) but de facto (a matter of fact).
yes, i know this for a fact. in 2010, they separated for a few weeks for marital and personal reasons.
Technically yes. It is illegal to be married to two people (that is bigamy). And the fact that you have been legally separated, although a distinct legal status, means that you are STILL MARRIED. You are able to get engaged (because you are technically single) but you should be aware that being separated is not being divorced.