Martin Luther initially expressed some sympathy for the grievances of the peasants during the German Peasants' War, seeing their demands for reform as a reflection of broader social injustices. However, as the rebellion escalated into violence, Luther became increasingly critical of the uprising, ultimately condemning it. He believed that the use of force was an unacceptable means to achieve reform and argued for order and authority. Therefore, while he acknowledged the peasants' plight, he did not support the rebellion itself.
Luther refused to support the peasants rebellion.
He denounced it and, with his support, nobles suppressed the rebellion.
i wrote this hehe
shays rebellion proved the need for a stronger government, so no it didn't
The West attempted to gain the support of the Chinese government for their policies. They needed to improve relations so another rebellion didn't happen.gain the support of the Chinese government for their policies APEX:)
Luther refused to support the peasants rebellion.
He denounced it and, with his support, nobles suppressed the rebellion.
He denounced it and, with his support, nobles suppressed the rebellion.
Martin Luther was a religious rebellion leader in England. He started the Lutheran Church, and fought against the Catholic monarchs.
It is false that Shays' Rebellion was carried out to support a weak central government. The rebellion was carried out by farmers who were upset with the courts taking their farms.
It is false that Shays' Rebellion was carried out to support a weak central government. The rebellion was carried out by farmers who were upset with the courts taking their farms.
Mackenzie found little support in the Upper Canada rebellion because most of the leaders had been arrested, which caused the rebellion to lose most of its momentum.
princes.
no
i wrote this hehe
George Wallace
shays rebellion proved the need for a stronger government, so no it didn't